Answer:
1) in some cases, the same weigh boat will be used by all students: This is True, but the weigh boat must be properly labelled with the compound that is intended to be weighed.
2) the empty weigh boat must be tared (set to zero) before adding material.: This is true because to get accurate weight, it is required to tare the empty weigh boat so as to get the weight of the material alone and not factor in the weight of the empty weigh boat.
3) a paper towel should not be used to transfer product out of a weigh boat: This is true because you want to ensure that no impurities is mistakenly added into the material that is being weighed.
4) the balances in the lab can be zeroed out with a weigh boat on the balance: This statement is true because there must be a counter weight to zero an already existing balances.
5) plastic weigh boats can prevent spillage when weighing liquids into a beaker: This is True because the plastic would help to ensure that the liquids is directly poured into the beaker without spillage.
Explanation:
Answer:
d.) Frank should not take the medicine because stealing cannot hold up as universal law, regardless of the potentially good consequences.
Explanation:
Universal laws are widely regarded as a way people conduct themselves. They are regarded as universal in their philosophical basis, applicability, acceptability, and translation.
For example fairness in dealings is a universally accepted concept.
In the given scenario however stealing is not a universal law and cannot be justified under any circumstance.
Although Frank's daughter Jenna is sick and he cannot afford the medicine.
He should not take from open drawer stuffed with vials full of the medicine Jenna needs because it is ethically wrong
The second amendment gives people the right to bear arms.
Answer:
Confirmation Bias
Explanation:
Confirmation bias is how one calls the tendency to interpret, favor, recall, and search for information in a way that it only confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. Kayla is encountering a case of these propensities when she's evading data that would repudiate her convictions about the smartphone and gives uncommon consideration to the data that would bolster her decision. Also, it is important to add that the Selective Exposure theory expresses that individuals may have a propensity to favor data that strengthen their convictions while giving little consideration to data that would negate them.
I believe the answer is: <span>uncertainty avoidance
</span><span>uncertainty avoidance refers to an effort that made by individuals to tolerate a certain amount of ambiguity in order to cope with their anxiety.
</span>This could often be spotted in superstition believers, because people like to attributing uncertain situation on the mercy of higher being in order not to held accountable for the outcome.
