<u>Answer:</u>
<em>SEXUALITY is a social issue </em>
For people sex involves <em>social importance and individual decision as opposed to organic programming. </em>
Sexual practices fluctuate extensively starting with one society then onto the next <em>EX. kissing, thoughts regarding unobtrusiveness, and gauges of magnificence. </em>
The inbreeding forbidden exists in all social orders since directing sexuality particularly proliferation is a fundamental component of social association. <em>explicit taboos change starting with one society then onto the next.</em>
The answer is: A. Patterson's coercive family process.
Patterson's coercive family process highlight the relationship between Caregivers and the children, especially during caregiver's effort to enforce a certain behavior to the children.
In coercive family process, the caregiver tend to try to force the children to conform to the caregiver's demand by utilizing negative emotions (such as raising their voice and use threats).
When this happen, the children became much more likely to respond with the same negative attitude. This resulted in negative perception that both the caregivers and the children have toward one another;
"To whom do individuals and groups report?" was the key questions addressed by this element.
<u>Explanation:</u>
An unbroken line of authority stretching from the top of the company to the lowest echelon and declare with transparency about who is accountable to whom known as "Chain of command".
From the bottom to the top of an organization it showcase company's hierarchy of reporting relationships. It also construct accountability and lays out lines of authority and decision-making power of authority or company.
The organizational structure is comprised of six fundamental elements named as: chain of command, centralization or decentralization, departmentalization, specialization of the work, span of control and the degree of formalization.
Yes, i have.
There was an aunt of mine who has been diagnosed with late stage of lung cancer. Every hospitals that we went said that there is nothing that they can do execept alleviate the pain for her last moments.
At that time, the whole family decided to tell her that everything is going to be okay and opted for the pain relieving treatment.
At that time, i could see that the whole family is being dishonest, since they now every thing is not going to be okay and considering telling my aunt about it.. But i somehow understand because they do it out of compassion and not because they had harmful intention.
Opal could successfully sue Nick for Guilty of Negligence.
In the very first place,when you see a person drowning, it's in your mind to save or let them be. The person drowning may die if not saved immediately and it will be in your conscience if you were not able to save them. You know that the situation is dire but you choose nothing to do about it then maybe you'll get sued for negligence.
