Answer:
As someone who is male, my actions are that of a male and expected of a male. While we live in a gender equal world, there are still gender-roles that we need to fulfill. That means despite being gender-equal, many women still expect me to become a gentleman. And I do it not because I am compelled by gender expectations but because I believe it is the right thing to do. Abiding by what is good and proper has brought me several benefits including being promoted at work. My upbringing as a male person as well has shaped how I behave today. I was told to respect women and other people by my parents, hence that is what I do right now. When someone else, a man or a woman is in need of help, I try to help them the best way I can. But of course, it is not always smooth sailing. There are also hindrances, for example in job placements. There are jobs where only women are allowed. This puts me at a disadvantage because I cannot apply for those jobs, despite me being qualified for them. But either way, whatever happens, I think what is important is mutual respect. Whatever our gender orientations are, if we have respect for each other, then the world will be a better place. Our socials skills need not be defined by our gender roles. So being male, or female should not matter, we are all humans.
I hope it will help you
plz mark me as brainliest
plz thank my answer
Answer: television is an attention grabber it’s loud, it’s colorful, and it’s distracting.
Explanation: The reason for this is our brains process information but not all of us have a great attention span for instance those of us who have watched TV often enough will begin to mimic things we see on TV we store that information into our brain for longer than we would if someone had just explained it face-to-face. The reason for this is our brains process information but not all of us have a great attention span for instance those of us who’ve watched TV often enough will begin to mimic things we see on TV we store that information into our brain for longer than we would if someone had just explained it face-to-face
Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Keynesians agree with the above statement, but monetarists do not.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Monetary policy is nothing but a policy followed by the central bank or any other banking agencies' authorities. As they can include control of money supply and interest rate that in turn helps the government to create growth in economic.
Keynesians also believe in the fact money supply has some relation with the growth f the country’s economy. They literally don’t mind about the rate of interest and the time provided to it. But Monetarists strongly believe in controlling the money in the economy.