answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady bird [3.3K]
2 years ago
3

In a small country near the Baltic Sea, there are only three commodities: potatoes, meatballs, and jam. Prices have been remarka

bly stable for the last 50 years or so. Potatoes cost 2 crowns per sack, meatballs cost 4 crowns per crock, and jam costs 6 crowns per jar. (a) Write down a budget equation for a citizen named Gunnar who has an income of 360 crowns per year. Let P stand for the number of sacks of potatoes, M for the number of crocks of meatballs, and J for the number of jars of jam consumed by Gunnar in a year. . (b) The citizens of this country are in general very clever people, but they are not good at multiplying by 2. This made shopping for potatoes excruciatingly difficult for many citizens. Therefore it was decided to introduce a new unit of currency, such that potatoes would be the numeraire. A sack of potatoes costs one unit of the new currency while the same relative prices apply as in the past. In terms of the new currency, what is the price of meatballs? . (c) In terms of the new currency, what is the price of jam? . (d) What would Gunnar’s income in the new currency have to be for him to be exactly able to afford the same commodity bundles that he could afford before the change? . (e) Write down Gunnar’s new budget equation. Is Gunnar’s budget set any different than it was before the change?
Business
1 answer:
xenn [34]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

(a) 360=2 \times P + 4 \times M + 6 \times J

(b) 2

(c) 3

(d) 180

(e) 180=1 \times P+ 2 \times M + 3 \times J

It is not different than before, he can afford the same amount of goods.

Explanation:

let's start by writing down all the components of the problem:

1. Potato's sacs ( P) cost 2 crowns,   denote the price a potato sack  by P_p

2. Meatballs ( M) cost 4 per crock,  denote P_m as the price of meatballs

3. Jam cost 6 per jar ( J),  denote P_j as the price of jam.

4. Gunnar has an Income M=360\\

His budget constrain is then:

  • The amount he spends in potatoes P_p\times P
  • The amount he spends in meatballs P_m \times M\\
  • The amount he spends in jam P_j \times J

He only spends money on those goods, then his expenditures equals his income

I=P_p \times P + P_m \times M + P_j \times J

360=2 \times P + 4 \times M + 6 \times J

(b) Next we need to re express all prices so relative prices are the same as before.

If the new price of potatoes is P'_p=1, then the price of meatballs will be P'_m=\frac{P_m}{P_p}=\frac{4}{2}=2

(c) the same can be done for jam

If the new price of potatoes is P'_p=1, then the price of jam will be P'_j=\frac{P_j}{P_p}=\frac{6}{2}=3

(d) Gunnar's Income would be then half as before

I'=\frac{I}{P_p}=\frac{360}{2}=180

(e) We can summarize everything re expressing Gunnars budget constraint

The old budget constraint was

I=P_p \times P + P_m \times M + P_j \times J

Now setting P'_p=1 is the same as dividing everything by P_p=2

\frac{I}{P_p}=\frac{P_p}{P_p} \times P + \frac{P_m}{P_p} \times M + \frac{P_j}{P_p} \times J

I'= P + P'_m \times M + P'_j \times J

180=1 \times P+ 2 \times M + 3 \times J

You might be interested in
Consider a Caribbean cruise route served by two cruise​ lines, Carnival and Royal Caribbean. Both lines must choose whether to c
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

Consider a Caribbean cruise route served by two cruise​ lines, Carnival and Royal Caribbean. Both lines must choose whether to charge a high price ​($320​) or a low price ​($300​) to vacationers. These price strategies with corresponding profits are illustrated in the payoff matrix to the right. ​ Carnival's profits are in red and Royal​ Caribbean's are in blue. Suppose the cruise lines decide to collude. At which outcome are joint profits​ maximized?

Joint profits are maximized when Carnival picks $320 and Royal Caribbean picks $320.

Explanation:

When Carnival picks $320 and Royal Caribbean picks $320, then joint profits are maximized.

Nash equilibrium would exist only when Royal chooses $300 and the carnival chooses $300.

However, if both Carnival and Royal Caribbean charge a lower price, both of them can earn a higher profit.

3 0
2 years ago
A broker followed the instructions in an escrow disbursement order. However, one of the parties to the contract sued the broker
densk [106]

The amount that should be associated with the given case is $16,000.

The computation is as follows:

= Money damages + cost of the court + attorney fees associated

= $8,000 + $3,500 + $,4500

= $16,000

In order to determine the value i.e. associated we add the above 3 items.

Therefore we can conclude that The amount that should be associated with the given case is $16,000.

Learn more about the broker here: brainly.com/question/1752402

4 0
2 years ago
Show the total cost expression and calculate the EOQ for an item with holding cost rate 18%, unit cost $8.00, annual demand of 4
torisob [31]

Answer:

Total cost = Total ordering cost + Total holding cost

Total cost = DCo     + QH

                     Q              2

Where

D = Annual demand

Co = Ordering cost per order

Q = EOQ

H = Holding cost per item per annum

D = 40,000 units

Co = $48

H = 18% x $8.00 = $1.44

EOQ = √2DCo

                H

EOQ = √2 x 40,000 x $48

                     $1.44

EOQ = 1,633 units

Explanation:

EOQ equals 2 multiplied by annual demand and ordering cost divided by holding cost per item per annum. The holding cost per item per annum is calculated as holding cost rate multiplied by unit cost.

7 0
2 years ago
Strand company is planning to sell 400 buckets and produce 380 buckets during march. each bucket requires 500 grams of plastic a
Alekssandra [29.7K]
Given the data in the problem, we can calculate the cost of production for each bucket:

one bucket requires:

500 grams of plastic and one-half hour of direct labor. 

The plastic costs $10.00 per 500 grams and the employees are paid $15.00 per hour. 

Therefore, one bucket costs (material and labor):

$10.00 + $15.00 * (1/2 hour) = $17.50 per bucket plus (1.10 * $7.50) = $25.75

for 380 buckets :

$25.75 * 380 = $9785

This value only represents the cost of production of 380 buckets for the month of March. <span />
5 0
2 years ago
Investment X offers to pay you $4,200 per year for eight years, whereas Investment Y offers to pay you $6,100 per year for five
marishachu [46]

Answer:

PVxa = $27,132.00, PVya = $26,413.00,

Explanation:

Present value (PV) is the value of the future expected cash flow. PV rests on the idea that the worth of a cash received is more than that of the cash promised to be received in the future. To calculate PV a stream of incomes to be received a number of period in the future, the following formula is used:

PV = C[\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n} }{r} ]

Where PV = present value

C = cash flow amount from the investment

r = discount rate

n = number of period, in this case years, to receive the cash flow.

The PV formula above is therefore employed to answer the question as follows:

<u>Answer to question (a) </u>

<em>For Investment X in question (a)</em>

PVxa = $4,200 * {[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVxa = $4,200 * {[1-(1+0.05)^-8]/0.05}

PVxa = $4,200 * 6.463212759

PVxa = $27,145.49      

<em>For Investment Y in question (a)</em>

PVya = $6,100*{[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVya = $6,100*{[1-(1+0.05)^-5]/0.05}

PVya = $6,100 * 4.329476671

PVya = $26,409.81  

<u>Answer to question (b) </u>

<em>For Investment X in question (b)</em>

PVxb = $4,200 * {[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVxb = $4,200 * {[1-(1+0.15)^-8]/0.15}

PVxb = $4,200 * 4.487321508

PVxb = $18,846.75  

<em>For Investment Y in question (b)</em>

PVyb = $6,100*{[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVyb = $6,100*{[1-(1+0.15)^-5]/0.15}

PVyb = $6,100 * 3.352155098

PVyb = $20,448.15  

Where PVxa, PVya, PVxb and PVyb represents PV for X and Y in questions (a) and (b).

Decisions:

1. In question (a) part where the PV of $27,145.49 of X is greater than $26,409.81 of investment Y, it is better to invest on investment X.

2. In question (b) part where the PV of $20,448.15 of Y is now greater than $18,846.75 of investment X, it is better to invest on investment Y.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • what other production activities could studios engage in if they didn't hire these mathematicians and scientists
    9·2 answers
  • During fiscal 2016, Shoe Productions recorded inventory purchases on credit of $337.8 million. Inventory at the start of the yea
    11·1 answer
  • On March 1, 2017, Carla Vista Co. acquired real estate, on which it planned to construct a small office building, by paying $84,
    13·1 answer
  • On January 1, the Matthews Band pays $66,000 for sound equipment. The band estimates it will use this equipment for four years a
    11·1 answer
  • Elessio has a small clothing company where he and a small team of people sell custom garments. Where does Elessio most likely wo
    5·2 answers
  • What is the best loan option for a neighborhood Lemonade stand? Why?​
    6·1 answer
  • As the newly-hired assistant controller for the City of Lancaster, you are asked to determine the amount of available funds. Aft
    12·2 answers
  • On December 1, 2018, your company borrowed $15,000, a portion of which is to be repaid each year on November 30. Specifically, y
    6·1 answer
  • Smyth Industries operated as a monopolist for the past several years, earning annual profits amounting to $50 million, which it
    6·1 answer
  • If the abnormal return for a stock during the first week is +5 percent and +3 percent during the second week, what is the abnorm
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!