Answer:
Comparing the opportunity cost and possible gains for both Juan and Wanda helps to determine which party should produce Pancakes and who should produce Bacon.
In other words, it reveals where their comparative advantages lie.
The party with the lowest opportunity cost in a particular product has the highest Comparative Advantage.
Explanation:
If for instance, the ratios give off Juan as having the highest opportunity cost in the production of Pancakes, when compared with Bacon and Wanda has the highest opportunity cost in the production of Bacon when compared to pancakes then Juan should focus on producing Bacon and Wanda Pancakes whilst they trade with each other for the other product where their comparative advantage is lowest.
Cheers!
The correct answer should be C)Behaviorists
Answer:
The decision of an ethics review committee about Dr. Franklin's research proposal is:
A:The proposal is approved, as it meets the ethical guidelines defined by the APA.
Explanation:
APA (American Psychological Association) has ethical guidelines for conducting psychological researches. The most relevant one in this case is: "follow informed-consent rules." Dr. Franklin clearly ensures that his students give their consents to participate in the eyewitness testimony study by having each sign a form to agree to participate in the research. I am also sure that the confidentiality and privacy of subjects (students who participate in the research) will be highly protected, in line with another guideline of APA, because these issues have not raised any controversy.
I would say true, because making a u-turn when you dont have the option to turn is considered illegal
