Suppose someone wanted to highlight the character development of a

English

1 answer:

Volgvan2 years ago

8 0

Answer: D. A novel

Explanation: If you use logic it says which of the 4 would make a good traditional story. It can’t be a research article because you have to use creativity not logic, it can’t be a photograph because a picture is to look at not write and a painting could tell a story but in an artistic viewpoint, it’s not the traditional way of writing a story. Now, a novel is the traditional form of writing that causes you to make up characters and do character development.

You might be interested in

Complete a chart showing how the First Amendment impacted a landmark Supreme Court Case.

Blababa [14]

Can you upload a picture of the chart plz?

7 0

1 year ago

How does Jing-mei "win" the disagreement over the piano lessons?

artcher [175]

Jing-mei wanted to show her gratitude to Mr. Chong. So with her mother's permission and her help she decided to give to her old almost deaf teacher the piano as a present.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Select the two unnecessary sentences in this text message.

Bumek [7]

Answer:

I believe it is when he talks about having his gear and the other sentence where he talks about the light system.

Explanation:

7 0

1 year ago

According to your textbook, when citing sources during a speech, a speaker should usually identify the

valkas [14]

<span>e. b and c only

As long as a speaker lets the audience know who the author of a study is, and gives a brief overview of their credentials or qualifications, the audience should be able to trust the information that the speaker is presenting, based on their credible research.</span>

3 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Match the fallacy with its name. Your grandfather died in World War II; you of all people should support veterans.

RoseWind [281]

Answer:

The fallacy is that veterans should be supported.

Explanation:

Fallacies are mistaken beliefs. Things that people believe in that don't make sense. In this passage, the narrator is saying to another person that all people should support veterans(people who were in a war) because their grandfather was killed in World war 2. But, that means that the grandfather was <em>killed by a veteran</em>! This doesn't make sense. The fallacy is that veterans should be supported.

5 0

2 years ago