One example would to influence internet commenters opinion upon a certain political agenda. Technically, this influencing practice is not written in bureaucratic policies, but is really important to do in order to obtain support from the majority of the people. It's also an important activity to do to strengthen a candidate's position during re-election process.
Answer:
The School Board says Libby and her friends released an unauthorized publication on school grounds. Their defense should be "the whole program (including content, publication, and location) was discussed with and approved by her teacher (her primary interface with the school hierarchy)" If there is any fault to be found, it falls on a) the Teacher's head since she didn't advise Libby to seek permission from any other members in the hierarchy, and/or b) the hierarchy itself for not conveying the need to seek permission for thios type of program. I'm sure other "publications" (artwork, themes, book reports, biographies, and so on) can be shown to set precedent for publications on school grounds without formal permissions.
Re First Ammendment Rights: The description of documents in the ammendment clearly parallels the content of the newspaper. Per referenced source": Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.
Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: <span>Müller-Lyer Illusion
The </span><span>Müller-Lyer illuison is consist of a set of three arrow-like figures, where the head of the second arrows would be drawn on the opposite direction than the first.
When the participants are asked to determine which arrows are longer after discounting the arrow-head, most people see the arrow with backwards head placement has the longer line even though the length of all arrow lines are the same.</span>
D) They eat a lot of fish.
Explanation:
- Both of them are living mostly on the sea side.
- Scandinavian states are among the greatest producer of fish.
- Alaska offers many different fishing opportunities. Probably the most famous river in Alaska is Kenai, especially known for giant specimens of king salmon (chinook).
Learn more on Alaska on
brainly.com/question/5031603
brainly.com/question/888867
#learnwithBrainly
The correct answer is a. the subjective meaning that deviants impute to their own deviant experience
<span>Phenomenologists refer to social scientists who emphasize the role of subjective consciousness, introspection and personal interpretations of reality. From a phenomenonological point of view, deviant reality refers to the personal and subjective meaning of what deviance really is. While one individual might consider a certain act as deviant, another individual might not consider it as deviant. In other words, what constitutes and defines deviance is subjective and differs from person to person. </span>
