The client suffered an unwarranted police invasion and this is outrageous because it disobeys the Fourth Constitutional Amendment.
We can reach this conclusion because:
- The defense attorney could claim that the home invasion without filing a search warrant violates the Fourth Constitutional Amendment.
- This amendment states that no search or seizure of evidence of a crime can be carried out in the suspects' homes, without a search and seizure warrant being presented.
- In this case, the lawyer could claim that the police violated a client's citizen's right by breaking into and searching the house for drugs.
While this is true, there are some cases where the Fourth Amendment can be ignored and law enforcement officers can break into homes looking for evidence of serious crimes, such as drug trafficking, for example.
Therefore, even using this fourth amendment to defend the client, he could not claim that the police acted incorrectly.
More information:
brainly.com/question/15026474?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Washington had served the country and wanted to live as a farmer. I think that is the answer.
Answer:
B. He is accused of being a heretic because of his beliefs.
Explanation:
I did it
Answer: Concern for the less fortunate and people in Poverty
Concern for those forgotten or ignored society
Concern for social justice
Concern with the welfare of other women
Explanation:
<span>
A smarter power grid would help resolve power failures. A power grid is a system that produces electricity and moves it where it needs to be when it needs to be there. The US power grid was created in the 1890s. <span>
</span></span>
