If you are driving in an unfamiliar area, it is best to be
aware of the road as you drive ahead in order to familiarize self and to
recognize the places around you, the only way to turn and best in the scenario
is when you arrive in an intersection, in turning to intersection, it is best
to slow down, turn on the signal light and turn when it is clear to turn and no
vehicle will pass through.
Explanation:
The five moral principles of Bioethics described by Vaughn are:
- Autonomy,
- Non-maleficence,
- Beneficence,
- Utility and
- Justice.
I believe that this list is complete because all five Vaughn principles are succinct and authentic, and unlike a more abstract approach, such as the normative ethical approach, such as the ethical approach to virtue and deontology, principlism corresponds to a methodology of better understanding and practicality for solving ethical dilemmas in the real world.
The five moral principles are of universal origin and not relative, because they are based on characteristics of a common morality, which is shared by all members of a society, is based on common sense and non-philosophical traditions.
This approach does not conflict with other ethical, theological and social approaches, as this is a consistent, practical approach that can be derived.
Answer:
direct damages
Explanation:
In contract law, direct damages may be defined as the reward received which is equal to the difference between the value to be given during making the contract or as agreed and the value actually received for the performance.
In the context, Carlos was awarded with $200 as direct damage when the women who initially hired Carlos at $700 to paint her house and later call off the work. Carlos found another job for $500 and thus sued the women for the damages.
Hence the answer is ---
direct damages
One of the risks is identity check. The identity of the author can be misleading to the researcher. So that, the authenticity is very important in this case. Browny Williams, Professor at the University of Louisville, Kentucky claims that misinterpretations are not easy to recognize if you live in different parts of the world.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The Articles of Confederation did not grant Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation were the first government document, or Constitution, of the United States. They were written in the summer of 1776 and taken over by the Second Continental Congress on November 15, 1777, after one year of debate. In practice, they served as the de facto system of government used by Congress until the Articles final ratification on March 1, 1781.
The Articles of Confederation laid down the rules of operation of the United States. The Confederacy could wage war, negotiate diplomatic agreements, deal with the problems of Western territories, spend money and borrow within and outside the States. On the other hand, the impossibility to determine taxes and regulate interstate commerce was a major shortcoming. The second weak point was the principle of one state, one vote. Larger states were expected to contribute more but had only one vote.
Originally, the intention was only a weak central government, which was supposed to rule, especially in an emergency. But the end of the war and the new priorities that emerged clearly showed many of the shortcomings of the Articles. They were replaced by the much stronger Constitution after ratification on June 21, 1788.
