Tita is the main character of the book<em> Like Water for Chocolate</em> by Laura Esquivel. The book follows her journey to try to find her voice and achieve independence from her dominating family. One of the most important aspects of Tita's life is food. Cooking is her escape, and it is the only way in which she can feel truly herself. Because of this, the food that she makes is closely tied to her emotions, state of mind, and personal growth. The different dishes, flavors and spices stand as symbols of her inner life.
Moreover, these recipes and ingredients are also meant to create an effect of exoticism and uniqueness of the context that is representative of magical realism. Both the context, and the strong component of family and society creates three sisters who are very different from each other. These sisters are defined by the order in which they were born, their age, their gender, their family and their role in society. These unique personal elements are also expressed through the use of different foods and ingredients associated with each one of them.
Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:hindsight bias
Explanation:Hindsight bias is a term used in psychology to explain the tendency of people to overestimate their ability to have predicted an outcome that could not possibly have been predicted.
example of hindsight bias is when people are wrong about the outcome of an event, but claim they knew it was going to go the opposite way to which they originally stated.
The correct answer is letter A
Explanation: The rotation movement of the earth is the rotation that the planet makes around itself, that is, around its own axis. This movement is counterclockwise from west to east and lasts approximately 24 hours.
