Answer:
d.) Frank should not take the medicine because stealing cannot hold up as universal law, regardless of the potentially good consequences.
Explanation:
Universal laws are widely regarded as a way people conduct themselves. They are regarded as universal in their philosophical basis, applicability, acceptability, and translation.
For example fairness in dealings is a universally accepted concept.
In the given scenario however stealing is not a universal law and cannot be justified under any circumstance.
Although Frank's daughter Jenna is sick and he cannot afford the medicine.
He should not take from open drawer stuffed with vials full of the medicine Jenna needs because it is ethically wrong
Answer:
Attitude Object.
In psychology, an attitude object is a person, place, idea or almost anything else of what you make a judgment about. This can be positive or negative.
In this case, Jack's business proposal was his attitude object. He had been working hard to make the client accept it, and it was really important to him, at the point that when the client finally accepted, he loudly expressed his enthusiasm.
Answer:
Well, signs could be trust sources and dates since it was published. Like for example, Wikipedia isn’t reliable since you can edit others answers and can be used as an opinion. On the other hand, things like History.com or such resources are by a trusted site right? Strong writers use different sources to expand their knowledge etc. I’m not sure if I helped so, I’m sorry if I wasn’t of use
Answer:
groupthink
Explanation:
Asterisk Inc. decided to change some of its policies. Jensen, a team manager, conducted a meeting to inform his team about the management's decision. During the meeting, the majority of Jensen's team members were in favor of the policies except Sandy. As a result, Sandy decided not to voice her concerns about the policy changes fearing negative consequences. This scenario illustrates the concept of <u>groupthink</u>.
Groupthink is based on the desire not to upset the balance/harmony of a group of people thinking about a situation, it is a phenomenon whereby a group of individuals reach a premature consensus on an issue without critical reasoning or evaluation of the consequences or alternatives in a bid to avoid dissenting views and opinion. It is a situation whereby harmony in a group is promoted more than critical and objective analysis of issues.
Answer:
where is the table we dont know the numbers
Explanation: