Answer:
a. computational tools
c. specific observations
Explanation:
Economists and engineers are professionals who work with an imminent risk that their projects will go wrong. The problem with these professionals is that any mistake can cause huge losses and even millionaires, so these professionals need to rely on certain elements to estimate a possible risk and resolve that risk before it causes a design error and causes huge damage to the project. professional.
The elements that economists and engineers use to estimate a possible risk must be rational elements based on concrete things and calculations that enable the simulation of an accurate result. Among the options given in the question, the elements that best fit this concept are computational tools and specific observations.
The devil's advocacy decision-making technique is where an individual in the group is allowed to become the critic in the proposed decision
Explanation:
This decision technique helps prevent groupthink and increases the chance of a high-quality decision. It also helps prevent companies from making expensive, risky decisions.
C. The firearm must be reloaded each time it is fired
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The statement radical Republicans worked for positive change in the best interest of all citizens can be refuted strongly as their work was not impartial and the discriminated against the African American citizens of the nation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The work of the radical Republicans was observed to be biased only towards the welfare of the white citizens, neglecting the development of African Americans.
- The bills that they passed during their regime were noticed to incline towards the good of the already privileged white citizens of the country.
- Their ignorance towards the popular outcries against the discrimination happening with the African Americans that they were not serious towards protecting the interests of African Americans.
