Answer:
Information
Explanation:
The information function of communication (in an organization) refers to the act of providing data and information so that employees can effectively complete their job.
These information is given so that employees are aware of the rules and procedures of an organization and what it's expected from them when doing their job. Another goal of this function is to eliminate job uncertainty since workers will be fully informed of what's going on.
In this example, the employees of the team are apprehensive about the structure and dynamics of how they will function as a group. So the manager will hold a meeting to provide them some additional training that might work well for the team.
The manager will give i<u>nformation to the employees so they can work better as a team (rules and procedures by providing them extra training) and this will also help diminish the uncertainty and apprehension</u> they are feeling about their functions as a group.
Thus, this is an example of the information function of communication.
Answer:
D: compromise
Explanation:
What Wendy and Josh experienced is best described as a compromise because both changed their minds for a purpose and benefit of their marriage's future. A compromise is an agreement in an argument, when the parts decide to reduce their demands in order to reach a balance that is satisfactory for both.
<span>The answer is resistance. It is
loosely defined as a client's unwillingness to discuss a particular topic in
therapy.</span>
<span>There are uncountable reasons
why clients can be resistant within a therapeutic relationship. People of all
cultures, natures, and personalities visit psychologists, each with their own
reasons for entering therapy. Some people may be ordered or referred by a third
party to enter therapy. Since they are not there of their own will, these
clients are often unwilling to be there and can show very obvious struggle to
the process. Regardless, many clients show some sort of resistance to the
emotional pain that change demands. Clients can be unwilling and opposed to
change even if it is what they desire, as change can be difficult, emotionally
painful, or scary.</span>
The correct answer is personalization.
This is a type of fallacy where you involve somebody's personality into an argument, even though it is completely unnecessary or wrong to do that. For example, if you are going to a dinner party and you are late, and the dinner is overcooked (completely unrelated to you being late), you might start thinking that it happened because of your tardiness, whereas that is obviously not the case.
The producers can create their maximum combination of goods,
as long as the producers address the consumer desires. In this way, they may
likely be efficient with the resources they get and use in a way of creating
goods that will be useful and that it won’t go to waste.
