The choices for the question are:
<span>a. MICR readers
b. RFID readers
c. SSDs
<span>d. OMRs
</span></span>OMRs input data from special forms to score or tally exams, questionnaires, ballots, and so forth. The answer to your question is D. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
Answer:
The conflict theorist would argue from the point of view of the society being in perpetual competition as a result of inequality of distribution of resources and power. The rich would not pave the way for cheaper technology as a result of them purchasing early version of expensive technologies but rather, everyone would aspire to be the first to buy such early version of technology due to prestige associated with it.
On the long run, the conflict theorists makes more sense due to the fact that, as more people aspire to buy the early version of technologies, it creates extraordinary demand for the goods. this would force the manufacturers to employ more workers inorder to meet up with the demand thereby leading to fall in the prices of such goods. An example is the Toyota brand cars that is popular in some countries.
Explanation:
Answer: (e) peer review
Explanation:
Peer review is the evaluation of an author's work by a group of experts, scholars, and professionals within the same field so as to check the authenticity, validity, and quality of such work, and also determine if it is worthy of publication. Such review also helps to determine if a work would be accepted or not.
Subjecting a work to peer review helps to maintain the quality of research work carried out as this comes with placing restrictions on work which do not meet the required standard or have inaccurate or false claims.
Answer: Deliberative
Explanation: Arguments which are embarked upon by members of a group usually in other to explain the different sides of a particular topic. In other words, deliberative arguments usually involves members of a group which work collectively to show people the pros and cons of a certain topic or subject before finally arriving at a certain general conclusion or consensus. In deliberative arguments, the objective or goal of the topic is already known by the collaborating proposed, but in other to resolve underlying unambiguities, participants first come up with different and incompatible views before finally reaching a consensus.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Dr. A was co-authing with W.R. Kapsner, C.A. Shuman, and C.R. Stearns, among others in 1994.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The collaborations done by scientists are mostly to serve the purpose of sharing expertise and dispensing assistance in the studies that are carried out in specific subjects.
- These collaborations often culminate in the discovery of new traits and attributes of the subjects in which the studies are conducted.
- It can be said that through expertise sharing, the knowledge base is increased considerably.
