The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare rules you may follow at home, at school, or at work. As you cross internal boundaries each day, why would each of these places have separate sets of rules?
At home, absolute I have to follow family rules. They are basic but non-negotiable. More than rules, these are principles that are base on love and commitment.
But when I am at school, yes, there is a set of rules on how to behave in class and on the premises, and how to correctly relate to each other, It is a challenge. It is my personality, behavior, and customs versus other students' and teachers' ideas. It is not an easy thing to do.
The workplace is something similar but with professional connotations. As pro people say, it is a job and you have to behave like one because the consequences are tough.
So it is true that we have to obey a different set of rules, according to the place we are.
The producers can create their maximum combination of goods,
as long as the producers address the consumer desires. In this way, they may
likely be efficient with the resources they get and use in a way of creating
goods that will be useful and that it won’t go to waste.
Answer:
A. The government did not interfere with the normal means of production.
Answer: Walking Green is an example of a CITIZEN-ACTION PUBLIC.
A citizen action public can be defined as a situation or a scenario whereby the decision of a company is being challenged by the the public which can be the consumers or any group that contribute significantly to the marketing success of the company.
The act of Walking Green challenging Kelstone Developers is an act of citizen action public.
