If you are talking about ethnics then the Indian american group would have the highest medium family income of 100,000<span />
Answer:
Investment theory of creativity
Explanation:
Researchers Robert Sternberg and Todd Lubart have proposed a theory called the <u>investment theory of creativity</u>. According to the authors, creative people are like good investors: they buy low and sell high. Their research show that creative ideas are rejected as bizarre or ridiculous by most people when they first come out, and thus they are worth little. Creative people are willing to champion these ideas that are not generally accepted, and it is in this sense that they are "buying low". They try hard to convince other people of the value of the new idea, and eventually they turn them into supported and high value ideas. Creative people "sell high" when they move on from the now generally accepted idea on to the next unpopular but promising idea.
A real world example of this theory was famous filmmaker Stanley Kubrick. When most of his movies first came out, they usually were met with mixed or negative reviews, as was the case of films like <em>A Clockwork Orange </em>(1971) or <em>The Shining </em>(1980). However, after a few years, they were widely recognized as cinematic masterpieces.
He works in a local hardware store as the lead salesperson for paint and painting supplies. (Apex)
When a <u>drawback</u> is imposed, US manufacturers are allowed to access rebates on taxes on goods they import to the country, as well as when they export them again. This is considered as something beneficial for local manufacturers, as they are able to improve their competitiveness towards overseas competitors who probably have less labor or material costs. In the overall scenario, this represents an advantage of trade regulation as it fulfills the purpose of increasing trade.
When a government grants <u>benefits</u> to producers, in order to foment the development of certain sectors, this represents an overall disadvantage, as there could be a potential inefficient assignment of resources due to the fact that there could be other sectors that could end up being more profitable for the country if they were to be assigned resources.
