<span>The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice. It is advisable to e</span><span>xplore the printing options since you have the ability to print multiple slides on one page. </span><span>I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!</span>
Answer:
The information provided to Kanska was insufficient.
Explanation:
The onus was on the company to provide all the necessary information for Kanska to work with.
An application development firm only creates applications based on the requirements gathered from clients and if clients don't divulge all necessary information, there is bound to be dissatisfaction in service when the mobile application is provided.
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement that, an advantage of FIFO is that it assigns the most recent costs to cost of goods sold and does a better job of matching current costs with revenues on the income statement, is not correct.
Under fifo method the most recent cost is assign to closing not COGS. It is LIFO method (last in first out ) in which the most recent costs is assign to cost of goods sold. Under the fifo method cost that is incurred first is charged first to COGS.
Answer:
(2) I. Express appreciation for trusting you to handle taxes II. Explain situation A. Unexpected income B. Change in tax codes III. Inform the client he owes an additional $10,000 in taxes IV. Close with a forward-looking statement.
Explanation:
This would be the best way to address this situation. In this example, the client is likely to be angry and upset when he realizes about the changes in his taxes. Therefore, you should try to preempt this situation. By expressing appreciation for using you to handle his taxes, you begin in a positive and friendly note. Moreover, you should proceed to explain the situation, inform him of the changes, and end on a kind note.
Its InElastic Because It Lowered Hope It Helped :)
