3x + 4y = -10
so the correct answer is C.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Total weight = 70.5 kg
Step-by-step explanation:
Rectangular frame is made from 5 straight pieces of metal. One of them goes through the diagonal of the rectangle.
2 pieces form the length of the rectangular frame, hence, they have a length of 12 m each
2 pieces from the width of the rectangular frame, hence, they a length of 5 m each
To find the length of the diagonal, we can use Pythagoras Theorem:
Hypotenuse² = Base² + Perpendicular²
Hypotenuse² = 5² + 12²
Hypotenuse² = 169²
Hypotenuse = 13
Hence, the length of the piece of metal placed at the diagonal is 13cm
Find the sum of all lengths of the metal pieces.
Total length = 12 + 12 + 5 + 5 + 13
Total length = 47 m
Total weight = 1.5 × Total length
Total weight = 1.5 kg/m × 47m
Total weight = 70.5 kg
Answer:
A(t) = 200+15t(1+0.02)^{t}
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the interest is calculated on the new balance every year.
Hence the formula used for compound interest is:
A = P(1+
^{nt}
where, A =Amount after t years
P =Principal amount
200 is the initial balance and Since, here the $15 is added to the balance each year. Therefore, P = 200+15t
r = rate each year (0.02)
t = time (in years) (t)
n = no. of times the interest is compounded in a year (n=1)
Therefore, the recursive formula is:
A(t) = 200+15t(1+0.02)^{t}
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
intercepts the x-axis at these 2 points:

⇒ 6 and 1/2 are roots ie; if you insert
or
into the equation of g(x) you will obtain a 0.

now in order for 0 to appear we should have 
now in order for 0 to appear we should have 
but
doesn't appear in any of these, but its multiple of 2 is there:

Therefore the function;

Company 1: f(x) = 0.25x² - 8x + 600
f(6) = 0.25(6²) - 8(6) + 600 = 9 - 48 + 600 = 561
f(8) = 0.25(8²) - 8(8) + 600 = 16 - 64 + 600 = 552
f(10) = 0.25(10²) - 8(10) + 600 = 25 - 80 + 600 = 545
f(12) = 0.25(12²) - 8(12) + 600 = 36 - 96 + 600 = 540
f(14) = 0.25(14²) - 8(14) + 600 = 49 - 112 + 600 = 537
company 2:
x g(x)
6 862.2
8 856.8
10 855
12 856.8
14 862.2
Based on the given information, the minimum production cost of company 2 is greater than the minimum production cost of company 1.