Answer:
Truman has a higher inventory turnover ratio and Stapleton has a higher gross profit ratio ( D )
Explanation:
Truman sell a large number of common household items ( assuming 100 unit )
while Stapleton sells a small number of expensive items ( assuming 20 units )
lets assume : Truman sells at $5 per unit and Stapleton sells at $50 per unit
with the above assumptions
Truman gross profit ratio = $5 * 100 units = $500
Stapleton gross profit ratio = $50 * 20 units = $1000
from the above assumptions you can deduce that the gross profit made by Stapleton is higher although he sells a smaller amount of goods while Truman has a higher Turnover because of its higher number of sold units
Answer:
Activity Rates
Consultation $150
Drawings $58
Modeling $0.7
supervision $190
Billings $1037.5
Collections $1642.5
Total overhead allocated: $ 126,826
Explanation:
First, we divide the cost of each activity over the base total to get the rate.
![\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}$Activity&Driver&cost&Total&Rate\\$Consultation&$contact hours&315000&2100&150\\$Drawings&$desing hours&104400&1800&58\\$Modeling&$square feet&32200&46000&0.7\\$supervision&$days&228000&1200&190\\$Billings&$jobs&8300&8&1037.5\\$Collections&$jobs&13140&8&1642.5\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccccc%7D%24Activity%26Driver%26cost%26Total%26Rate%5C%5C%24Consultation%26%24contact%20hours%26315000%262100%26150%5C%5C%24Drawings%26%24desing%20hours%26104400%261800%2658%5C%5C%24Modeling%26%24square%20feet%2632200%2646000%260.7%5C%5C%24supervision%26%24days%26228000%261200%26190%5C%5C%24Billings%26%24jobs%268300%268%261037.5%5C%5C%24Collections%26%24jobs%2613140%268%261642.5%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Now we apply this rate against the job activity measurement:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}$Activity&Job&$Rate&$Allocated\\$Consultation&410&150&61500\\$Drawings&352&58&20416&\\$Modeling&7400&0.7&5180&\\$supervision&195&190&37050&\\$Billings&1&1037.5&1037.5&\\$Collections&1&1642.5&1642.5&\\$Total&&&126826&\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccccc%7D%24Activity%26Job%26%24Rate%26%24Allocated%5C%5C%24Consultation%26410%26150%2661500%5C%5C%24Drawings%26352%2658%2620416%26%5C%5C%24Modeling%267400%260.7%265180%26%5C%5C%24supervision%26195%26190%2637050%26%5C%5C%24Billings%261%261037.5%261037.5%26%5C%5C%24Collections%261%261642.5%261642.5%26%5C%5C%24Total%26%26%26126826%26%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
<span>Originally, I thought I would consider Todd to be my agent. After finding out that Todd did not inform me concerning his ownership of the two condos, I don't believe I would be comfortable with him. While his ownership may not change anything, I just was uncomfortable with the fact that he didn't tell me.</span>
What is the question? sorry I can't help
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The damages can be recovered as Jerome and Gary hung the playground swing improperly. A child was injured due to their negligent actions. The case will be on Meadowbrook Playground and not on the individual person who has committed the mistake. According to law, the damages can be recovered as the enterprise owned the whole property, and due to their carelessness in the installation of swing, the accident took place. The child's parent has every right to recover damages from the playground owner.
