Answer:
The setting
Explanation:
It's where the story is happening
According to this ruling, the government can regulate speech if the words that were spoken (or printed) represent a "clear and present danger" to American society.
This ruling came as a consequence of the case <em>Schenck v. United States (1919)</em>, in which the general secretary of the U.S. Socialist Party opposed the implementation of the military draft. He distributed pamphlets encouraging people to oppose the draft. The unanimous decision was that his words represented a clear and present danger to the country, and therefore his arrest was justified.
The answer to this question is B!
Answer:
Respectable woman+avian creature=Cleaned Dishes and Laundry done
Explanation: