Answer:
<h3>He needs 5 more months of savings for him to reach his goal. </h3>
Explanation:
Given the equation that models Damon's saving plan as y = 500 + 400x where x represents the number of months since last week and y represents the total amount he's saved for the vacation. Since he estimates that he'll need about $2,500 for the trip, therefore y = $2,500.
In order to determine how many more months of saving (x) it will take to reach his goal, the following steps must be taken by Damon (Damon true statements)
Step 1:
y = 500 + 400x
Step 2: Subtract 500 from both sides
y - 500 = 500 + 400x - 500
y-500 = 400x
Step 3: Substitute y = $2500 into the resulting equation and solve for x
400x = 2500-500
Step 4: Take the difference of the value at the right hand side of the equation
400x = 2000
Step 5: Divide both sides by the coefficient of x (i.e 400)
Step 6: Get the value of x
x = 5
Answer:
One might consider her personality to be indicative of authoritarian, which is one of the jurors' characteristics associated with incorrect verdicts.
Explanation:
Authoritarianism is presented by people who are in a position of superiority where other citizens depend on their decisions and positions. Authoritarianism occurs when a person positions himself aggressively, based on extremely conventional values and ignoring contrary opinions and signs of weakness in other people. It also ignores individual citizens' freedoms and any attempt at counseling, which allows authoritarian people to misinterpret things in the right ways and end up making incorrect decisions. In relation to the question above, it can be considered that April's personality is indicative of authoritarian, which is one of the characteristics of the jurors associated with incorrect verdicts.
I believe <span>A new force sweeping through the world in recent time would be the most logical to me.
Globalization was accelerated out of proportion after the development of internet. Ever since globalization era started, almost all companies change their business approach to cater to the new force in order to ensure their survival.</span>
Answer:
- When making an analysis and map of another person’s argument, you should correct obvious mistakes.
- In analyzing and mapping the statements in an argument, context is not important.
Explanation:
The argument map is made to present a visual representation of the structure of an argument, showing all the premises, objections, counter-arguments, themes and statements that led to the construction of the given argument. This type of representation is used to support the reasoning and critical thinking of whoever is analyzing the argument.
In this case, whoever analyzes the arch for the construction of maps, must not correct errors, even small and perceptible errors, but must build the map the way the argument was built, even with its mistakes and successes. The context of the argument is very important at this point, since without the context, it is impossible to determine the reasoning and thinking that composed the argument.
Answer: Negative Reinforcement
Explanation: Negative reinforcement is an efficient method that can be used to help teach desired behaviors by removing something uncomfortable in response to a stimulus which overtime, that target desired behavior increases with the knowledge that the unpleasant thing will be taken away.
for example when a mother switches off the TV when a son hasn't done his homework, and is watching cartoon, this will increase the chances that the son over time will do his homework before watching TV as he understands his mother would put off the TV if he doesn't .
Also, putting on a sweater when a person feels it is cold would make him or she feel warmer which will lead to an increase in the probability that response will be repeated in the future.
