Answer:
A) change in the cost of eating index = <u>20% increase</u>
B) Suppose that consumers are completely indifferent between two chickens and one ham. For this example, how large is the substitution bias in the official "cost-of-eating" index?
The <u>INCREASE</u> in the cost-of-eating index is <u>18</u> %.
The <u>OVERESTIMATE</u> of inflation in the cost of eating reflects substitution bias.
Explanation:
2015
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $4 $120
hams 10 $5 $50
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $250
2016
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $5 $150
hams 10 $7 $70
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $300
A) ($300 - $250) / $250 = 20%
B)
if consumers are indifferent for 2 chickens per 1 ham, then the new basket should be assuming consumers will purchase the cheapest option:
2016
product units unit cost total
hams 25 $7 $175
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $255
the increase in inflation would have been = ($255 - $250) / $250 = 2%
the substitution bias = reported inflation - real inflation = 20% - 2% = 18%
Every country had different types of coins with different values and they were not easily comparable in value with the money from the other countries. This could have been fixed with collaboration between neighboring countries from certain areas to create same types of coins that have the same value so that they can use them easily for the trade that was occurring between the different economies.
Every craftsmen that had the skills and tools and suitable material was able to create copies of the money. This could have been fixed with strict regulations on every craftsmen by the authorities. Also putting a unique mark on the different types of coins by the official producers that was not easy to be copied.
Answer:
Financial and non-financial information for internal decision makers.
Explanation:
Managerial accounting is related to the information that is used for the management of the organization and its information is not widely used for external users. It is almost used by the internal decision makers. The information mostly relates to the effective running of its operations and control mechanism implications.
Answer:
Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Explanation:
The unit profit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit - Fixed cost per unit
Unit Profit of product A = $21 - $11 - $5 = $5
Unit Profit of product B = $12 - $7 - $3 = $2
Unit Profit of product C = $32 - $18 - $9 = $5
The profit of each product in 1 machine hour = 1 hour/ Machine hours per unit * Unit Profit
Profit of Product A in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2 * $5 = $25
Profit of Product B in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.5*$2 = $4
Profit of Product C in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2* $5 = $25
Product A & Product C have same profit in 1 hour machine, then we have to consider Direct labor hours per unit which product A is 0.4 while product C is 0.7. It means Product C is more costly in direct labour than Product A.
In short, then the ranking of the products from the most profitable to the least profitable use of the constrained resource is Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Answer:
<u></u>
Explanation:
The <em>expected return</em> is the weighted average of the expected returns in each scenario by its respective probability.
The <em>distribution of the holding period returns </em>(HPR) under three different scenarios is:
State of the economy Scenario #(s) Probability, p(s) HPR
HPR Boom 1 0.336 28.40%
Normal growth 2 0.414 7.90%
Recession 3 0.25 18.90%
The calculations are:

