I do not agree that “the only beneficiary of the entrepreneurial wealth is the entrepreneur him/herself.”
The entrepreneur may be the chief beneficiary when she is alive to reap the rewards of their entrepreneurial efforts. But, she is certainly not the only beneficiary of the entrepreneurial wealth that she creates. Nobody works in isolation. When the entrepreneur commences her business, society as a whole benefits because any individual wealth created increases the wealth of the nation and the world. She only gets the profit share of the created wealth. Customers who patronize her services and goods also derive satisfaction of needs (utility or value). The entrepreneur's wealth is also shared to the government in form of taxes. Suppliers of primary goods and services also share in the wealth of the entrepreneur. And employees of the entrepreneur also take a large share of the created wealth.
But, who is an entrepreneur? She is somebody who assumes some entrepreneurial (first-time) risks in order to set up a business for the manufacture or provision of goods and services for the purpose of profit. Her business may not be profitable in the short-run. She can even lose tons of money initially until the profit stage sets in. As she preserves, the profits will start rolling in, provided she had done her homework well.
Answer:
Investors with an experience of financial crises are better at diversifying their portfolios
Explanation:
When an investor has experienced a financial crisis in the past, and decides to diversify his investment portfolio as a result, he is using both human judgment and experience to take the best decisions available to him.
Diversifying your investment porftolio is a good decision because it reduces risk (although it may also reduce profitability so there is a trade-off). Investors with past experience tend to spread their investments in order to reduce risk and avoid large losses. They do this because they see the possibility of a new financial crisis in the near future.
Answer:
a. 10,000 units
Explanation:
The computations of units completed are shown below:
= Beginning work in process units + units started - closing work in process units
= 3,000 units + 11,000 units - 4,000 units
= 10,000 units
For this question, we ignored the equivalent units as the question has asked about the completed units only
So, all other information is irrelevant
Answer:
meal option is cheaper with total cost = $2000 and hall only option is total cost $2700
Explanation:
given data
The meal option = $50 per person.
Hall free = $ 0 per person
total guest = 40
hall-only option = $1,500
external caterer = $30 per person
solution
when we go for meal option than hall free so total cost will be as
total cost = total guest × $50 per person
total cost = 40 × $50
total cost = $2000
and
when we go for hall only option than total cost will be
total cost = total guest × external caterer charge + hall-only option
total cost = 40 × $30 + $1500
total cost = $2700
so
meal option is cheaper with total cost = $2000 and hall only option is total cost $2700
Explanation:
First of all, the dealer should not have sold the car to the sixteen year old boy without the presence of his parents or any guardian. It is illegal to have a contract with a child who is not legally allowed to drive the car before the age of eighteen.
Now secondly if the dealer has somehow sold the car to the boy, the boy cannot come back after few months and ask for returning his money because he purchased the car, the condition of the condition of the car got worse during the whole time when car was with him, and also there is no legal clause in the agreement which allows him to demand his money back after using the car for this long time. So demanding his money back from the dealer is totally unethical as well as illegal. The dealer is true that the car is still the property of the boy and the money is still the dealer's money.
