Answer:
The correct option is B,decrease.
Explanation:
In calculating present value , the future value is divided by the discounting factor,hence, the higher the discounting rate, the higher the discounting factor.
Besides,since the relationship between future value and discounting factor is that of numerator-denominator relationship, it would be logical to say the higher the discounting factor , the lower the output of the mathematical operation,present value and vice versa.
From the foregoing, it is very clear a higher discount rate triggers a lower present value and vice versa
Answer:
$546,750
Explanation:
Sales 2,498,000
COGS (1,376,000)
gross profit 1, 112,000
S&A salaries (219,000)
other S&A (346,000)
underapplied MO (10,250) *
net income 536.750
*we need to compare the actual voerhead with the applied overhead:
<u>actual overhead:</u> 176,000 + 420,000 = 596,000
<u>applied overhead:</u>
overhead rate:
568,000 / 32,000 = 17.75
33,000 x 17.75 = 585.750
overhead
<u>debit credit</u>
596,000 585,750
10,250 underapplied overhead
As the applied was lower it is underapplied we need to recognzie more cot thus, the net income decrease.
Answer:
c. Common Stock $50,000 and Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par Value $20,000.
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Cash $70,000 (5,000 shares × $14)
To Common stock $50,000 (5,000 shares × $10)
To Additional Paid in capital in excess of par value - Common stock $20,000 (5,000 shares × $4)
(Being the issuance of the common stock is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cash as it increased assets and at the same time it also increased the overall stockholder equity so common stock and the additional paid in capital for common stock is credited
Answer: His district manager may be influenced by <u><em>availability bias. </em></u>
Explanation:
Availability bias may influence his manager because the district manager has this information in his recent memory. He may consider this to be an accurate description of Otis's behavior all of the time, and not just in recent times. Since everything has occurred since the last evaluation he may be judged solely on these actions and not of his overall actions and work ethic in the past.
There are several ways to avoid availability bias such as:
- Set high standards
- Build a diverse team
- Utilize your network
- Seek input from your team
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u></u>
growth_multiplier is 1.1
savings = 100
desc = "compound interest
"
# Place product of growth_multiplier and savings to year 1
Year 1 = growth_multiplier* savings
# Print
print(type(year1))
Now,
# Place addition of desc & desc
doubledesc will be desc + desc
# Print doubledesc
print(doubledesc)
<u></u>
