A tradeoff is a balance achieved between two desirable but incompatible feature. So the reasonable answer would be B
Answer:
a. Copy the range of cell D7:D9 then select cell D6 and paste the selection with date format selected. The function will be represented in formula bar with adding +4;365 days.
b. Copy the range of cell D7:D9 then select cell D6 and paste the selection with date format selected. The function will be represented in formula bar with adding -3;365 days.
c. In the formula bar type =365 days; +2 : E6
d. In the formula bar type =365 days ; +2 : C6
Explanation:
Excel is a software which helps the users to easily calculate complex calculation with just one function input. The users can create worksheets using the excel and then link those worksheets with each other. The data can be displayed in the form of table or simple text. It has multiple options to create annual day wise filtered worksheets.
Answer:
the answer for the first question is $166667.
the answer for the second question is $210526
the answer for the third question is An inverse.
Explanation:
given information that i will invest in a $10000 scholarship that will pay forever.
the interest rate charged is 6.00% per annum therefore this is a perpetuity present value problem where there is streams of income forever therefore we use the formula :
Pv of perpetuity= Cf/r
where Cr is the cash flows payed by the single investment forever in this case $10000 then r is the interest rate of the investment amount which is 6% in this case.
Pv of Perpetuity= $10000/6%
=$166667 therefore i must invest this amount to get the scholarship running with streams of $10000 forever.
in the second problem if now the interest rate is changed from 6% to 4.75% then the amount to be invested would be :
Pv of perpetuity = $10000/4.75%
=$210526 therefore this is the amount to be invested for a forever $10000 stream of incomes for a scholarship.
the relationship is indirect cause as the interest rate decreases the present value of the perpetuity that must be invested increases.
Answer:
The answer is: the equilibrium quantity is larger than the socially optimal quantity.
Explanation:
In order for the equilibrium quantity and the socially optimal quantity to be equal, the government subsidy should have been equal to the positive externality created by the flu shots ($8). Since the government subsidy is larger, $11, then the equilibrium quantity will be higher (more flu shots supplied because of high subsidy).
Answer:
The amount paid should be $1,600
Explanation:
The terms of 2/10, n/30 means 2% discount for the payment within 10 days and the full amount to be paid within 30 days.
Beacon Food Stores purchased canned goods at an invoice price of $4,000. Half of the goods were returned immediately to the supplier.
The remaining amount of the invoice that Beacon Food needs to pay is $2,000
Beacon Food pays the remaining amount of the invoice within the discount period. The amount of discount the company is offered = $2,000 x 2% = $40
The amount paid = $2,000 - $40 = $1,600
