Answer:
Since the expected value is higher for not suing ($600,000), then Jay should not sue. The expected value of the best case scenario in case of suing is only $500,000 and in the expected value of the worst case scenario is -$37,500.
Explanation:
he decides to not sue = expected value $600,000
he decides to sue:
50% chance of winning
expected value
- $2,000,000 x 50% x 50% = $500,000
- $500,000 x 50% x 50% = $125,000
50% chance of losing
- expected value = -$75,000 x 50% = -$37,500
She can write a check, she can withdraw money from ATM, she fill out a withdrawal slip, she can transfer money to another account
Answer:
Correct option is B
more in supplier development for A items.
Explanation:
In materials management, the ABC analysis is an inventory categorization technique. ABC analysis divides an inventory into three categories—"A items" with very tight control and accurate records, "B items" with less tightly controlled and good records, and "C items" with the simplest controls possible and minimal records.
The ABC analysis provides a mechanism for identifying items that will have a significant impact on overall inventory cost, while also providing a mechanism for identifying different categories of stock that will require different management and controls.
Answer:
This question lacks answers. Here they are:
A) Early adopter
B) Early majority
C) Innovator
D) Late majority
E) Laggard
Answer is B) <em>Early majority </em>
Explanation:
These are the adoption categories. They measure how inclined a customer is to adopting a new product or technology. Each category describes the main aim and goal of the customer when trying the new product.
Naturally, all categories are on the gradual scale:
Innovators -> Early adopter -> Early majority -> Late Majority - > Laggard
with the <em>innovator</em> being the group that is adopting the product immediately after launch, while the <em>laggard</em> is very change-resistant, rarely making choices regarding the adoption of something new.
The thinnest line is probably the difference between <em>early adopters</em> and the <em>early majority</em>. Early adopters are not as fast as innovators when it comes to product adopting and they are often doing it because of coolness or the "wow" factor of the product. Although the time of adoption for the early majority is the same or a little bit longer than early adopters, the key difference is that the early majority puts functionality over coolness when something is new and ready for adoption.
In this example, Ariana want to receive great functionalities for the given money, so she turns to ratings, reviews and recommendations from early adopters and innovators (Eric). Eventually, when it is determined that the product proves its value, the early majority adopts it.
Answer:
A. 68,800
Explanation:
Cash balance at end of April is = Beginning cash balance on April 1st + Cash collection in April - Purchase of Materials in APril - Operating Expense in April - Capital Expenditures in APril = 14000 + 42000 - 7000 - 7000 - 5000 = 37000
Cash balance at end of May is = Beginning cash balance in May + Cash collection in May - Purchase of Materials in May - Operating Expense in May = 37000 + 45000 - 7200 - 6000 = 68,800
