Answer:
Alpha
Beta
Delta
Epsilon
Zeta
Explanation:
The customers list should be updated and sorted periodically to identify regular customers and those customers with big orders. There are many customers in the list and the list is not sorted according to alphabetical order. Those customers which account for more than or at least 5% of total trade are Alpha, Beta, Delta, Epsilon and Zeta. These are place first in list among other customers.
Answer:
The answer is 60%
Explanation:
Labor force is the total number of people that have job(employed) and the number of people who are willing, able and actively searching for job(unemployed) in a population.
Labor force participation rate is calculated by dividing the labor force by the noninstitutionalized population.
Labor force = employed + underemployed + unemployed
= 96 + 31 + 8
=135 million
So we have:
(135 ÷ 243) x 100 percent.
60% (the nearest whole percentage)
Answer:
Kaynaddi here is the answer of your question
The agent is not the owner of the apartment so he will not take care of the apartment, because he isn't supposed to pay the cost of fixing damages in the apartment. To mitigate this risk renter can be asked to pay a deposit which can be adjusted for any damages done in the apartment.
A provision in the lease agreement for the annual renewal allows an incentive for a renter who is long term. Doing so will help maintain leased apartment.
Answer:
D. 34.00%
Explanation:
The computation of the new contribution margin is shown below:
As we know that
Contribution Margin = Net Sales Revenue - Variable Expenses
where,
Net sales revenue is
= 604 units × $32.5
= $19,630
The variable expense = Total material cost + total labor cost
Total Material Cost = 604 units × $14.36 = $8,673.44
Total Labor Cost = 604 units × $7.09 = $4,282.36
So, the variable expense is
= $8,673.44 + $4,282.36
= $12,955.8
Now
Contribution margin = $19,630 - $12,955.8 = $6,674.2
And,
Contribution margin ratio = Contribution margin ÷ net sales
So, Contribution margin = $6,674.2 ÷ $19,630
= 34.00%
Answer:
Isn’t "corporate entrepreneurship" an oxymoron?
I guess that most people would believe that corporations and entrepreneurs and completely opposite, and for the most part they are right. But some corporations actually do have entrepreneurial spirit or at least try to. E.g. 3M is famous for allowing their employees some creative time so that they can come up with new ideas. Google is another example of a large corporation that allows for creative time while at work.
Do the characteristics of an established organization, such as its routines and structure, increase efficiency but at the same time kill any entrepreneurial spirit?
Routines, schedules and corporate structure not only kill, but they rather massacre and exterminate entrepreneurial spirit and creativity. One great example of how corporations do not allow people to think or act differently can be seen in the movie about Ford competing in Le Mans.
Is there any way that a company can have the best of both worlds?
I guess that it is difficult, but not impossible for a company to have corporate entrepreneurship. The problem is that corporations will probably believe that it is a waste of money to pay for their employees to do nothing and just wander around thinking about new ideas. Creativity has a cost and not everyone is willing to pay for it.
