Answer:
40 days.
Explanation:
In the absence of the information about opening receivables, the closing figure is assumed to be the average accounts receivables,
Hence,
Debtors Turnover Ratio for Reagan:
= Sales ÷ Average Accounts Receivables
= $608,000 ÷ $73,922
= 8.22 times
Assuming that the number of days in a year as 365,
the firm's days sales uncollected for the year works out to:
= 365 days ÷ Debtors Turnover Ratio
= 365 ÷ 8.22
= 40.40 or 40 days.
Jello!!!l!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer: option D
Explanation: A Limited liability partnership is an ownership style which exhibits characteristics of both partnership and corporations. This was implemented for the benefit of business entities and for the ease of owners.
a. In a limited liability a limited partner will never be personally liable for the debts.
b. A general partner can be a limited partner as long as there are two legal partners.
c. A general partner cannot be a secured creditor as he will always have unlimited liability.
d. A Limited liability partnership is the form of partnership in which some or all of the partners have limited liability.
Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.
* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.
Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false
Answer: 1 year
Explanation: According to the Defence Federal Acquisition Regulation under 237.106, personal service contracts that apply to consulting or expert services will be limited to one year. However this will only apply to duties that are temporary (limited to 1 year, or 12 months), or non cumulative days (needs to be 130 days or more that are broken up within a year). During this time the officer contracting the service will enter into a contract, make an order, or exercise options for various services that do not exceed 1 year.
