Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the following :
Number of shares purchased (2016) = 50
Purchase price of shares $396.33 per share
Closing price per share four years later = $778.38
A) What did Chadwick pay for all of the shares in 2016?
Purchase price per share × number of shares.
$396.33 × 50 = $19,816.50
B) What was the closing value of all of the shares four years later?
Closing price per share × number of ahaf
=$778.38 × 50
= $38,919
C.) Profit on stock :
$(38,919 - 19,816.50)
= $19,102.5
D) What is his rate of return on his shares when he sold them?
(Current Purchase - initial value) /current price
(778.3 - 396.33) / 396.33
= (381.97 / 396.33) 100%
= 0.9637675
=
Step-by-step explanation:
The given objective function is 
To check that which ordered pair is minimizing the objective function-we will substitute all the ordered pair one by one in the given function and we will calculate the value of C. The ordered pair which will give the minimum value will be the answer.
For (0, 160)

For (55, 70)

For (80, 50)

For (80, 50)

Hence the ordered pair which minimizes the objective function is (80, 50)
Answer:
yes, it is possible to have the sum of square roots equal the square root of the sum of the radicands.
If either a or b equals zero, then the sums would be the same.
Since the square root of 0 is 0, adding it to a given radical would not change the radical. Also adding zero to the radicand would not change its value.
these are the right answer for E2020