We have to find how the chess player can move a knight from one location to another.
Also we have to remember that the bottom - left square is labelled ( 1 , 1 ).
First he wants to move a knight from ( 3 , 2 ) to ( 5 , 1 ).
Answer: 2 squares left, 1 square down.
Then he wants to move it from ( 5 , 1 ) to ( 6 , 3 ).
Answer: 2 squares right, 2 squares up, 1 square left.
Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that

So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Katie is 6; Cathy is 18!
X- Katie’s age now and 3x -Cathys age now
In 6 years, Katie is 12 and Cathy is 24.
2 x (X+6) = 3x + 6
2x + 12 = 3x + 6
6 = x
The awnser to this question is Macro Forecasts
If there's 100 cookies, of which there are 40 oatmeal raisin and 10 sugar cookies, there are 50 out of 100 cookies which you want. Hence by chance, there is a 50/100, or 1 in 2 chance of you obtaining an oatmeal raisin or a sugar cookie.