Answer:
D) inconsiderate
Explanation:
The word that best describes Claudia is inconsiderate.
Answer:
B. Sponsor critical infrastructure security and resilience-related research and development, demonstration projects, and pilot programs
Explanation:
The PPD-21 known as the Presidential Directive on Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience is set up to advance national unity with an effort to stregthen and maintain secure and reisilient critical infrastructure.
To sponsor critical infrastructure security and resilience-related research and development, demonstration projects, and pilot programs is not part of what the PPD-21 is set up to achieve. Rather it is developed and implemented to:
• Perform critical infrastructure risk assessments; understanding dependencies and interdependencies;
• Developing and coordinating emergency response plans with appropriate Federal and SLTT government authorities;
• Establishing continuity plans and programs that facilitate the performance of lifeline functions during an incident;
Answer: Amnesia
Explanation:
Since Tanruk was asked a series of test questions, and she answers very few correctly, the disorder that Tanruk probably have is amnesia.
Amnesia is referred to as memory loss and it is the inability for someone to remember events for a period of time which is usually as a result of brain injury, or ageing. People who have amnesia find it difficult to learn new information and remember things that have happened in the past.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
Confidentiality is keeping in secret details of a particular event,document or fact.
Here the grades of the students are in strict confidentiality and are meant to be kept save from unknown or unauthorized personal. The students broke into the system to get this scores and even alter the scores, it is a crime against confidentiality of the scores because they are very important documents the school keeps with strict confidentiality.
Answer:
I would study people's behavior without mobile phones
Explanation:
My hypothesis would be: People become lost once their mobile phones are taken away from them.
I would select a group of people, different genders and ages, and tell them to spend a week without using their mobile phones at all. I would observe their behavior and their reaction to the fact that they would not be available to everybody 24/7. I'm convinced that they would not know how to communicate properly any longer, or how to go about their choirs without the help of the internet. I think that they would become angry and irritable, even violent, without their phones during the duration of my experiment.
