Answer:
E. goal incompatibility.
Explanation:
Analyzing the scenario above, it is possible to see that the cause of the conflict is due to incompatibility of goals, that is, there are different objectives and goals between the teams and organizational departments, which causes a lack of consensus that culminates in the conflict.
This is a negative situation for the company, which is a set of systems that must operate in favor of the same objectives and goals. in order to listen to all the parties involved, and then start from a principle where everyone feels heard and integrated in the development of organizational goals, creating an environment of trust and positive relationship in the company.
Answer:
1. 23-24
2. 65+
3. very little teens pay taxes, meaning they dont have a job
4. it is easier for 18+ people to get hired for a job
5. jobs would need to become more readily available for younger people
Answer:
Gain/loss= $7,500 loss
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Selling price= $24,000.
Lassen bought the machine for $52,000 and has claimed $20,500 of depreciation expense on the machine
First, we need to calculate the book value:
Book value= original price - accumulated depreciation
Book value= 52,000 - 20,500= $31,500
If the selling price is higher than the book value, the company gain from the sale.
Gain/loss= 24,000 - 31,500= $7,500 loss
Answer:
False
Explanation:
"Cash-to-cash Analysis and Management" by<em> Hutchinson, Farris and Anders</em> talks about the availability of the<em> financial data</em> and <em>computer technology</em> in assisting a business when it comes to determining its <u>cash-to-cash position </u><em><u>(C2C)</u></em><em>,</em> as well as the <em>benchmarks</em> needed for comparison.
Cash-to-cash analysis was difficult in the past, however, it is easier nowadays. The supply chain is even examined at a broader view than before. C2C efficiency is possible by utilizing the<em> readily available</em> financial date and computer technology. So, this makes the statement above as "false."
So, this explains the answer.
Answer:
$78.0 million
Explanation:
Cost of repurchase = Number of shares*Share price/(1-1%)
Cost of repurchase = $3,352,720 * $23.02/(1-1%)
Cost of repurchase = $3,352,720 * $23.02/(1 - 0.01)
Cost of repurchase = $3,352,720 * $23.02/0.99
Cost of repurchase = $3,352,720 * $23.25
Cost of repurchase = $
77,950,740
Cost of repurchase = $78.0 million