Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
Answer:
The answer is C. Contemplation.
Explanation:
According to the stages of change model, we can say that Faith is in the contemplation stage. In this stage people consider the possibility to begin with healthy behavior soon, it is said that people could do this within the next 6 months.
In this stage, people consider and recognize the fact that their behavior could have undesired consequences, and they also consider the pros and cons of making a change related to their behavior. They give the same importance to both aspects. Although people recognize the situation, they could still have contradictory feelings or ideas regarding their behavior change.
Hello. Unfortunately you did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
It is only possible to answer this question if the text it refers to is read. In this text, you should look for the moment that shows the incident at the mosque and analyze why the way Adnan behaved in that incident was so disturbing and uncomfortable for the people present at the place. This behavior should be linked to the motives that led Adnan to be accused of murder, where you will see if his behavior is related to the charge, making it easier to show that Adnan is guilty of the charges he receives.
Both Miriam and Luz have a total of 36 items in their bags (4bags x 5toys +4bags x 4snacks = 20+16=36). Since Luz has 18 toys in three bags (3bags x 6toys) that leaves 18 healthy snacks (36-18=18) for Luz to place equally into 3 bags. So Luz has 6 health snacks in each bag (18/3=6).
Answer:
Honeymoon
Explanation:
The Honeymoon Period of adjustment which is also the first period of cultural shock is mostly extremely optimistic during which travellers get infatuated with the language, people and food in their new environment. At this point, the journey or transfer seems like the biggest decision ever made, an thrilling journey to live forever. This stage is characterized by happiness, anticipation, and excitement.
Aaron feels a little bewildered and lonely at times, he is very excited and curious about the new culture in which he is has just begun a temporary work assignment. He is in the honeymoon stage of adjustment, according to the revised W-shape adjustment model, where he feels excited and optimistic about the whole idea.
