Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
France was effectively contained by strong neighboring powers.
Explanation:
The results of the Congress of Viena created a new European landscape.
Delegates caused a reconfiguration of European geopolitical system:
<em>Since European powers wanted to reset back to pre Napoleonic times, the goal of containing France was to restore the old limits and resize the distribution of land so they could create a way of balancing each other and remain in peace.</em>
Metternich was one of the key delegates: he wanted to avoid future wars with France, so he restored power back to Europe's royal families and France was forced to return the territories it once gained from Napoleon in 1795, till 1810.
<u>This meant that Russia increased its influence over Poland and Finland.</u>
<u>In the case of the Austrians, their power was limited in order to preserve peace. </u>
Ethnographic research continues to provide a deep understanding of informants' everyday lives and cultures, due participant observation. Participant observation is type of method for collecting data in order to make qualitative research of cultures, people and processes. In this method <span>the observer participates in ongoing activities and records observations.</span>
Answer:This is most consistent with INNOVATION form of adaptation in Merton’s theory of strain
Explanation:
Robert Merton focused on explaining why people tend to commit to deviant behavior within society and he opposed the other theorists who believed that it is derived by individual motives. Merton argued with these theorists by suggesting that some people feel that the only way to adjust in a normal way within society is to turn to criminal activities to alleviate their critical situation. He referred into anomie or strain theory , anomie which state that
due to confusion of what is happening in one's life and how hard they find it to achieve certain goals in a normal way they will resort to criminal activities.
The first way is to conform to society which means accept what ever is defined by society by pursuing success only in the ways acceptable within society such as education and earning money through a job.
The second reaction is innovation , this refers mostly to criminal act these are people who still believe they must pursue success just they innovate their own ways to pursue that success. They turn to deviant behavior because they want to achieve the success expected from them just that they use deviant innovations.
Such as the student above , he want to do well in school hence he innovate cheating as a way to help him achieve this goal.
Answer:
Brainstorming
Explanation:
BRAINSTORMING can be defined as the process in which group of poeple gather together in which efforts are been made to find a conclusion and solution for a particular problem by gathering a list of ideas which is been contributed by the members, thereby providing a means for tapping the creativity of a limited number of people for a large number of ideas, decision and concepts in order to solve the problem with lateral thinking. Which is why BRAINSTORMING is the potentials participant or members have in drawing associations between their ideas in a free-thinking environment or society thereby creating solution by simulating the brain in order to come up with original ideas.
