Answer:
The given first statement is true, that is, with the increase in the demand for chicken, the chicken market will rise, and in the same way with the decline in the demand for beef, the production of cattle will decrease based on the law of demand.
The given second statement is also true, as the resources mentioned in the given statement is a tragedy of commons as the common access resources are rivalrous and non-excludable.
The given third statement is also true, as the mentioned ocean fisheries is a tragedy of commons as the common access resources are rivalrous and non-excludable.
It would have to be the third answer, "a strong thunderstorm destroys many of the nests of a bird population."
The answer on this scenario would be that most of the people would rely on external brains these days in order to connect to people.Hope this would be the answer on this question and would surely be of help then.
Both Aristotle and Linnaeus classified animals and plants, considering where the species lived. However, Linnaeus delved further into classifying organisms looking at their morphology, with an ordered subset of the organism's class divided into five kingdoms: class, order, species, genus, and variety. The process of this classification is called Taxonomy, however, modern scholars also consider the evolutionary history of a species, in the classification process.
Answer:
Some species will develop adaptations to survive in the deforested land.
Some populations will migrate out of the deforested area.
Explanation:
The deforested land will be able to support large trees eventually in the future, and animals cannot instantly adapt to anything.
Therefore, the most logical answers are populations will migrate to forest lands and species will eventually develop adaptations to help them in the newly deforested land.
I hope this helps! :)
