Answer: effect or consequence
Explanation:There are three part that makes up an assertive message it's the behaviour,feeling and the effect.
Teh behaviour is explained that William want to go and visit over his friend probably because he wants to relax and his father states his own feelings towards this.
The father thought doesn't state what will be the effect for William if he goes over to his friend which is will be probably more influential in changing his mind about going over to his friend .
The lack of the consequences on the message may make the receiver not see why his behaviour need to change or why he may need to rethink it.
Answer:
positive reinforcement.
Explanation:
Positive reinforcement is a type of reinforcement , and it means giving a thing to a person as a reward after performing a desired action or work.
Examples of positive reinforcement include giving biscuit to a child as an encouragement or compensation for a job well done and getting paid for a completed task.
Other types of reinforcement are
* Negative reinforcement....removing something negative to increasing a response,
* Punishment reinforcement.... means addition of something aversive to decrease a behavior,
* Extinction reinforcement......is the removal of a thing to decrease a behavior.
In this case, the $10.00 received by kelly for every 110 clowns she completed, is an example of positive reinforcement.
This environment may have a negative effect on her brain development. Such environments can cause stress or fear, which impairs brain development. Also, studies have shown that these stressful environments can cause learning disabilities and delay a child’s development (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child). Harvard published a writing on this from the source mentioned, I recommend you check it out for this question. Here is the link: http://46y5eh11fhgw3ve3ytpwxt9r.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Persistent-Fear-and-Anxiety-Can-Affect-Young-Childrens-Learning-and-Development.pdf
One of the results of the Schenck decision is: <span>A.The decision removed protections for dangerous speech.
Dangerous speech is not considered a heavy violation of the law due to the nature of the first amendment. For example, no matter whether a doctors is right or wrong, police could no arrest him simply just by saying "this patient couldn't be saved"</span>
Answer: the correct answer is A. biological; psychological
Explanation:
The <u>biological</u> perspective suggests that psychological disorders result largely from faulty physical processes, and the <u>psychological</u> perspective emphasizes the importance of factors such as stress and thoughts as well as environmental factors in the development of psychological disorders.
