I believe that the best answer among the choices provided by the question is <span>B. By giving the student extra credit if the student also enrolls in the equivalent course</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Answer:
C). It describes how testimony on the brutal practices on sugar plantations convinced Parliament to end the slave trade.
Explanation:
As per the question, in the given passage from "Sugar Changed the World", the author's central claim is to display that how 'sugar trade led to the end of slavery' which he substantiates by proposing the evidence that states 'how acute brutality of sugar plantations persuaded the parliament to change its viewpoint and mark an end to the ongoing brutal enslavement/slave trade'.
This claim is reflected through the phrase "in the age of sugar, slavery...extreme brutal' that compelled the parliament to review its norms of slavery and mark its ending. Therefore, the author states 'sugar.....link between slavery and freedom'. Thus, option C is the correct answer.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13652825#readmore
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
One way to fix that sentence is to switch around the two phrases used; 'My mother and father are both scientists' and 'It must have been my destiny to become interested in biology.'
It must have been my destiny to spark an interest in Biology, as my mother and father are both scientists.
That's a way to fix that sentence used in your question.
Also, 'destiny' was spelled incorrectly.
This sentence may seem run on if you don't place a conjunction between the two phrases, or if the phrases are not switched.
If the sentence is to be used with a conjunction, it may end up like this....
My mother and father are both scientists, so it must have been my destiny to become interested in biology.
Or, you may just use a period, to change the two phrases used into two separate sentences.
Like this;
My mother and father are both scientists. For that reason, it must have been my destiny to become interested in biology.
ALSO, as you can see above, I have added a few words to the last sentence. Those three words, 'For that reason', give closure to the two sentences.
Hope this helped!
C. Alliteration. Alliteration is the presence of the same sound or letter beginning each word, Countless cattle and crops covered the countryside
