Most of us were taught (if we were taught grammar at all) never to split infinitives, but writers have been splitting them anyway--even long before the creators of the Star Trek<span> series provided us with the often-quoted phrase "to boldly go where no man has gone before." Those of us who were taught that the split infinitive is anathema might well benefit from examining the origins of this rule and considering cases where we might, with good reason, be excused for ignoring it.</span>
The best revision of this sentence is the following:
The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in the hopes of winning the trial.
A pair of parentheses needs to be used in order to separate this information from the rest of the sentence and facilitate reading and comprehension. The information in the parentheses is related to the meaning of the sentence but in some way it interrupts the flow, so a pair of parentheses is necessary in order to indicate this.
Answer:
saw
Explanation:
It is in the present tense
Answer:
are you giving an answer??
Explanation:
Answer:
The writer notes that she “trusted in [her] resourcefulness to escape” when forced to join the Confederate Arm
Explanation:
i just KNOW
