Answer:
This is the sample answer
Explanation:
After a natural disaster, such as a major hurricane, there is increased demand for gasoline, lumber, bottled water, clothing, and other essential goods as people try to replace and rebuild what was lost. At the same time, the supply of these goods likely decreases because of disruptions to factories and transportation. Under normal market conditions, producers would raise their prices at the first sign of trouble, both to offset their own losses from the disaster and to obtain optimal profits.
However, people who have lost everything need to start rebuilding as soon as possible at a price they can afford to pay. The sooner the community is rebuilt and back to normal, the sooner the local economy will return to normal for both consumers and producers. For this reason, I think the government should introduce price ceilings on essential goods during a disaster. Many people would not be able to buy the goods they need without price ceilings. Although producers lose out on maximizing their profits, their actual losses are limited because they are allowed to raise prices to cover production and transportation costs driven up by the disaster.
Because citizens benefit so greatly from them, I think emergency price ceilings are beneficial to the economy as long as producers do not suffer significant losses from them.
Answer and Explanation:
The preparation of the bank reconciliation statement is presented below:
Balance as per bank $8,732.00
Add: Deposit in transit $3,500.00
Less: Outstanding checks -$1,486.00
Adjusted bank balance $10,746.00
Balance as per books $8,768.00
Add: EFT received from customer $2,023.00
10791.00
Less: Service charges -$45.00
Adjusted book balance $10,746.00
Answer:
Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its issue is mentioned.
Explanation:
- The very first e-mailed submission from Altisource that doesn't even dispute Lucas' suggestion would have been the proposal which most definitely meets the part of the arrangement to create a contract. It is when Altisource's e-mail was approved that they committed to it. Today, if a new arrangement with added provisions is presented two days after ratification, it can not be accepted as an aspect of the binding agreement.
- If they could have some trouble with the arrangement, they could've just discussed the based distribution and therefore not approved the agreement. It would never be altered until they have approved it but the same could be known as either a contract arrangement.
Answer:
c.Product customization
Explanation:
What is Product customization?
Its a type of strategy that companies implement to attarct more customers. It usually implies the modification of designs, uses and/or characteristics of their items to satisfy the customer’s needs or desires.
This policy has the benefit of giving the company the opportunity to stand out from the competitors by fine-tuning items and services. Therefore the company gains a bigger portion of market share
In this case, KFC, altered their global formula in order to gain more acceptance in the Japanese market
Answer:
D) declaring victory too soon
Explanation:
John Kotter in this theory of leadership explains the concept and importance of change. He basically believes that the company shall be currently functional.
By the term currently functional he means that the company shall be updated and working on with the current market trend. This means the company shall not be resistant to change and that the management shall take a note of it.
Further in the moving scenario there is no freezing point - the company shall constantly work on the new things which it can improve and excel.
Thus, final confirmation cannot be made soon as towards the change made.
