Answer:
Isn’t "corporate entrepreneurship" an oxymoron?
I guess that most people would believe that corporations and entrepreneurs and completely opposite, and for the most part they are right. But some corporations actually do have entrepreneurial spirit or at least try to. E.g. 3M is famous for allowing their employees some creative time so that they can come up with new ideas. Google is another example of a large corporation that allows for creative time while at work.
Do the characteristics of an established organization, such as its routines and structure, increase efficiency but at the same time kill any entrepreneurial spirit?
Routines, schedules and corporate structure not only kill, but they rather massacre and exterminate entrepreneurial spirit and creativity. One great example of how corporations do not allow people to think or act differently can be seen in the movie about Ford competing in Le Mans.
Is there any way that a company can have the best of both worlds?
I guess that it is difficult, but not impossible for a company to have corporate entrepreneurship. The problem is that corporations will probably believe that it is a waste of money to pay for their employees to do nothing and just wander around thinking about new ideas. Creativity has a cost and not everyone is willing to pay for it.
The answer would be that there are few other places to purchase soda on campus; competition (or lack thereof) can play a big factor in determining price elasticity.
While nutrition information can shift consumers' preferences, we have no indication within the question of whether or not the students are well-informed of the impact of their drinking choices.
As for the third option, we are not given any information on the students' budgets, and no information with which to infer this, either. We only have information on their spending as it is related to soda, not as compared to other purchases.
Finally, given that the quantity sold does not change much despite the change in price, we can conclude that this price curve is relatively inelastic, in which case the price elasticity of demand would be closer to zero than one. This effectively rules out the last answer.
Answer:
Please consider the explanation below
Explanation:
a.Optimal order quantity per order = √2CO / I
= √[2*1500Units*625 ]/ (130)
=√1875000/130
=120 units per order
b.Minimum total annual inventory costs
Annually orders = 1500 / 120
= 12.5 times
Ordering cost = 12.5*625 = $7812
carrying cost = 120 units *$130 = $15600
Total annual inventory cost = $23412
c.The number of orders per year
= Annual denand / Optimum oder
= 15000 U / 120
= 12.5 times
• d.The time between orders (in working days)
= 364 / 12.5 (considered one leave)
= 29.12 days
=29 days
Answer:
a)
<em>The value added at each stage</em>
Stage Value added($)
1 1000
2 (2000-1000) = 1,000
3 (6,000- 2000) = 4,000
4 (10,000 - 6,000) = 4,000
b)
The amount by GDP is increased = $10,000
c) Reduce GDP
Explanation:
Gross domestic product (GDP) which is the total market value of all the final goods and services produced in a country over a given period of time. The GDP can be calculated using the value added approach.
Here the GPD figure is ascertained by summing the amount of additional value created by each factor of production at each stage of the production process of the final product.
a)
<em>The value added at each stage</em>
Stage Value added($)
1 1000
2 (2000-1000) = 1,000
3 (6,000- 2000) = 4,000
4 (10,000 - 6,000) = 4,000
b)
The amount by GDP is increased = $10,000 which is the total value added or the market value of the final goods
c)
If the lumber were imported it would be deducted from the value of export and thus reduce GDP. Remember that GDP is the market value of all good and service produced within a given country over certain period of time .
Answer: a. Anticipate the effect your message will have on the receiver.
b. Analyze the bad-news situation
Explanation:
In the Phase 1 of the writing process, it is required that one should analyze the bad-news situation, and then anticipate the effect that such news will on have on the receiver. After this has been one, the message will then be adapted accordingly.
In a scenario whereby it's anticipated that the reader will be upset about the news, then the message might be reshaped so that the reader won't be angry.
