Answer:
C) The limitation of monarchical power
Explanation:
The Habeas Corpus Act strengthened the ancient and powerful writ which had been a feature of English Common Law since before Magna Carta. It served to safeguard individual liberty, preventing unlawful or arbitrary imprisonment. Habeas Corpus is Latin for “you may have the body” – subject to legal examination before a court, or a judge.
Answer/Explanation:
The title of the book has a painting of a historical fiction event.
Goods and services are manufactured to satisfy the needs of potential consumers (the demand-side of the market). The different decisions made by the producers (the supply-side of the market), to define how to undertake the manufacturing process, are the following:
- To produce items at a lower cost or higher quality ways to make the biggest profit. There are two ways of becoming the most attractive supplier to consumers in a market: either offering goods at the lowest cost or, even tough the goods are a bit expensive, making consumers appreciate them because of their outstanding quality.
- Methods traditionally used to make a good. Of course the producer needs to consider the production methods available, traditional ones, and also innovative, as this latter ones will allow him to differentiate his output from the one of his competitors (by obtaining products with either best prices or best quality).
1. Circulus in demonstrando: Also known as circular reasoning because the reasoning assumes the conclusion is true.
2. Argumentum ad populum: Sometimes occurs due to “peer pressure” or groupthink phenomenon when you may be influenced to conform to the opinion of the group.
3. Single cause/complex cause: a causal situation where we are unsure of the actual root cause of the issue. It’s possible to ignore a possible cause or to incorrectly assume a common cause.
4. Red herring: this argument states that the action (or conclusion) is a justified response to another wrong action (or conclusion)
5. Argument from ignorance: this occurs when there is no real evidence for the argument. Superstitions are a good example of this.
6. False dilemma: the “either/or” fallacy – the argument presents only two extreme alternatives and does not allow for alternative options.
7. Association fallacy: indicates that one negative action will lead to another, and then another worse one, and so on and so forth all leading to a terrible end result
B (2), I believe. It gave them power to choose communism or democracy, most would choose democracy.
Tell me if this is right or wrong. (: Apologies if it is wrong.
