Answer:
Number of order = 13.2 times
Explanation:
The economic order quantity is the order quantity that minimizes the total of ordering costs and holding costs.
EOQ is computed thus:
EOQ =√ (2× Co× D)/Ch
Co ordering cost - 2000,
Ch- holding cost - 13.5%× 26 =
A- annual demand - 200,000
EOQ = √(2× 2000× 200,000)/(13.5%× 26)
= 15,097.02712
The number of times IAI would place order
= Annual demand ?order quantity
= 200,000/15,097.02
= 13.2 times
Answer:
Training
Explanation:
Learning within a workgroup is the only way to improve performance. An outstanding representative as Roberta needs to transfer her skills to the rest of the team. One strategy to accomplish that is naming her as responsible for on-board training for the new teamates.
Another strategy is to use surveys after the calls to know what are the opinions of clients regarding services. It allows to identify improvement opportunities.
Answer:
$375
Explanation:
If Johnson will use the desired gross margin percentage to determine the selling price of its products, they must use the following formula:
selling price per unit = total manufacturing costs per unit / (1 - gross margin)
Total manufacturing costs = variable manufacturing costs + total fixed costs + batch level fixed overhead = $2,350,000 + $1,200,000 + $200,000 = $3,750,000
total manufacturing cost per unit = $3,750,000 / 20,000 units = $187.50
selling price per unit = $187.50 / (1 - 50%) = $187.50 / 50% = $375
Answer:
Olson can successfully press charges and force Duncan to take care of the damages caused to the car ( D )
Explanation:
Chuck Olson age 16 ( a minor ) can successfully press charges and request/force Bobby Duncan used cars center to take care of the damages caused to the car. this is because according to traditional common laws a contract entered by a minor is considered null and void hence Olson can successfully disaffirm the contract and Bobby Duncan would have to accept the damages and take care of them.
A minor is not required by traditional common law to entered into any form of obligatory contract.
<span>The defendant seeks to offer into
evidence the fact that the mayor was convicted two years ago of taking a bribe
to award a city contract for solid waste disposal. Yes, this is a documentary evidence
and is admissible because the mayor is already proven convicted of corruption.</span>
