<span>The court should rule in favor of the company, given clearly outlined policies and a counseling session. Documentation and expectations were stated, and the behavior continued beyond the counseling session. Monitoring her behavior as indicated seemed within the company's discretion.</span>
Ski Market sells snowboards. Ski Market knows that the most people will pay for the snowboards is $129.99. Ski Market is convinced that it needs a 45% markup based on cost. The most that Ski Market can pay to its supplier for the snowboards is $71.49.
Explanation:
- people will pay for the snowboards is $129.99.
- Ski Market is convinced that it needs a 45%
- The most that Ski Market can pay to its supplier for the snowboard is
- =
×45 - =$ 58.5
- =129.99 ±58.5
- = $71.49
- Therefore, Ski Market can pay to its supplier for the snowboards is $71.49.
Answer:
A. Social needs
Explanation:
Social need is an individual need to have a relationship with others. It involves socialization with one's environment and society. According to Maslow hierarchy of needs, the social need comes after an individual psychological and safety need as been accomplished. Social needs involves making friends, finding love, having lots of intimacy and various series of connections with other individuals. By been able to make new friends and understand her city, the new job seemed to satisfy Serenity need for social relationships and interactions.
Answer: In a market served by a monopoly, the marginal cost is $60 and the price is $110. In a perfectly competitive market, the marginal cost is $60. If the marginal cost increased from $60 to $75, the monopoly would raise its price <u>by less than $15</u>, and the price in the perfectly competitive market would <u>increase to $75.</u>
Explanation: The monopolist attends to the market demand, therefore the choice of the monopolist is limited by the market demand. If you set a very high price, you will only sell the amount that the demand you want to buy at that price, so it will only increase by less than $ 15.
In a market of perfect competition the companies are accepting price and will produce until the price is equal to the marginal cost so the price would rise to $ 75.
Answer:
Reactively, Proactively.
Explanation:
The above statement deals computing forces companies dealings with customers. Generally, in real-life dealings, we cannot afford to have a choice between Proactive and Reactive approaches. Proactive approach is generally more effective in terms of avoiding /reducing loss of life and property etc. however, it depends on the situation, time available to take action and resource availability. I have seen that even in the case of worst natural disasters like cyclones , proactive approach by civic authorities ,on the basis of limited scientific forecast inputs available, helped in averting major damages.
However, if there is a sudden accident, we have no other choice but to react on the spot. In some situations, like disasters ( man-made or natural) , a combination of proactive and reactive approaches can be more effective.
