Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
1. Calculate the profit margin
Profit Margin = (Net Income/Net Sales) × 100
Profit Margin = (4,500,000/13,800,000) × 100
Profit Margin = 3.26 × 100
Profit margin = 32.6%
2. Calculate the basic earnings power.
Gross Profit Margin:
= Gross Profit/Net Sales × 100
= (8,700,000/13,800,000) × 100
= 6.304 × 100
= 63.04%
3. Calculate the return on assets.
Return on assets= Net income/Total asset
= 4,500,000/53,800,000
= 0.0836
= 8.36%
4. Calculate the return on equity.
Return on equity = Net income/Equity
= 4,500,000/22,300,000
= 0.2017
= 20.17%
5. Calculate the dividend payout.
Dividend payout = Dividend/Net income
= 2,500,000/4,500,000
= 0.556
= 55.6%
Answer:
The answer is letter A.
Explanation:
The true statement is Annual data on the distribution of income will indicate that the degree of income inequality in the two cities is identical.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Your age, driving record, and annual mileage.
Explanation:
Auto insurances take into account several risk factors at the moment of evaluating what type of coverage insureds should purchase. Individuals' <em>age (higher premium if older), driving record (higher premium if negative), and average annual mileage (higher premium the more mileage</em>) are key factors insurance companies tend to consider to find out what is the most convenient policy for those people and based on that, the premium that will be charged every month.
Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.
* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.
Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false
Answer:
Explanation:
Current Forecast Horizon Terminal
Year ($ millions) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Sales ........................................................$2,785 $3,838 $5,289 $7,288 $10,043 $10,244 ....................................................330 455 627 864 1,190 1,214NOA .........................................................533 735 1,012 1,395 1,922 1,961ROPI Model
NOPAT – [NOABeg× rDiscount
factor [1 / (1 × ] ...................0.88496 0.78315 0.69305 0.61332 Present value of horizon ................342 416 507 619 present value of horizon ........$1,884 Present value of terminal ...............5,375 .........................................................533 Total firm value ........................................$7,792 Less ..............(462) Firm equity value .....................................8,254 Shares outstanding (millions) ..................103.3 Stock value per share ..............................$ 79.90
