Answer:
Collectivism
Explanation:
The collectivism refers to the group who worked as a team and given the priority according to their roles, designations.
As we use the concept synergy that 1 + 1 give 11 i.e means due to efforts of group we can accomplish the company target as compare to the individual effort.
Since in the given question, the Daniel workplace does not have any structured hierarchy and all employees are treated equally so in this case, the collectivism is low in this organization.
Answer:Accept Option B
Explanation: The concept of Future Value helps to to critically analyze investment opportunities so you can make decisions among options amd most importantly pick the project that yields the highest return.
The Future value of project A after discounting is $881.4 and for project B is $10,487.8
This is because of the difference in the amount invested.
The difference in return is $10,487.8-$881.4 = $9,606.4
Answer:
b. $28,000 and $12,000 respectively
Explanation:
The marginal cost and marginal revenue refers to the additional cost or revenue that is generated for adding an additional unit or increasing the ouput by one unit,
In thi case, moving to Large reservoir from Medium reservoir
Marginal cost: 72,000 - 44,000 = 28,000
<em>It cost 28,000 to move to a large reservoir</em>
Marginal revenue :64,000 - 52,000 = 12,000
<em>It generates additional benefit for 12,000</em>
Answer:
C) $1,166,000
Explanation:
The sales budgeted will be
unit sales budgeted x unit sales price
we look into the assignment for these numbers:
- February sales 10,600 units
And calcualte: 10,6000 units x $110 sales price
Total sales revenue for the month of February 1,166,000
The rest of the data is irrelevant for the question we are given thus, we ignore it.
Answer:
<em>2.statute.</em>
Explanation:
<em>The court ruling will be decided by the contractual agreement signed by the three parties. A Limited Liability Agreement will usually be demonstrated by three parties signing a contract together. </em>
The situation will become difficult once, within each partner, there is no written statement about the distribution of profit. Every partner must obtain the suitable yield rate, based on their original investment.
The verdict begins to appear as if it falls into the hands of the state. By considering the Revised Uniform Partnership Act-Section 306. It relies heavily on where the business is registered, authorized, type of business.
However, John is the majority shareholder with 60 per cent of financial and legal accountability[ which is why he owes more to investment return]. It is also partly due to unlawful double tax laws and they are intended to protect the owner / partner of the business.
The confusion could've been avoided if an attorney and bookkeeper were available to describe the process, before the agreement was made and/or written. The condition they submit for incorporation makes a huge difference however, it does not seem to be the circumstance.
