All categories

2 years ago

Do law enforcement agencies really seek an efficient amount of lawbreaking rather than no lawbreaking?

Business

1 answer:

Levart [38]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Yes, law enforcement agencies do look forward to some amount of lawbreaking.

Explanation:

Law enforcement agencies' job is to deal with anyone who fails to abide by the law and indulges in illegal activities. They get paid for it and if there is no lawbreaking in their region, their employment would be of no use. Their revenue depends on lawbreaking activities so they expect some amount of illegal activities to keep their business up and running. For e,g. speeding tickers bring a good amount of money for them. If everyone drives within the speed limit, law enforcement agencies will lose a certain amount of revenue.

You might be interested in

After spending months finalizing a marketing plan, the lead marketing manager presents it to the entire company. It soon becomes

Sauron [17]

The correct answer is A) alignment.

After spending months finalizing a marketing plan, the lead marketing manager presents it to the entire company. It soon becomes clear that the budget given in the plan is far lower than the marketing team had determined it would need. This mistake is likely a result of a lack of alignment.

This means that the marketing manager did not respect the parameters originally indicated. His numbers did not align with the necessities of the plan, which means that he did not take into consideration some important factors that at the end, affected the end result of the budget.

7 0

2 years ago

Jessica weighs 125 lbs. She rode a bike at 17 mph for 25 minutes. What is the calorie cost of this activity?

Tomtit [17]

Answer: 178 calories

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that Jessica weighs 125 lbs and that she rode a bike at 17 mph for 25 minutes. It should be noted that 17 mph is thesame as 0.057 cal/lb/min.

Therefore, the calorie cost of this activity will be:

= 0.057 x 125 = 7.125

We then multiply 7.125 by the number of minutes used. This will be:

= 7.125 x 25

= 178 calories

3 0

2 years ago

A toy manufacturer makes its own wind-up motors, which are then put into its toys. While the toy manufacturing process is contin

Shalnov [3]

Answer

The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.

Step-by-step explanation:

You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.

4 0

2 years ago

The following information is from the 20X1 annual report of Weber Corporation, a company that supplies manufactured parts to the

DENIUS [597]

Answer:

ROA for 20X1= 10%

Profit margin for 20X1= 5%

Assets turnover= 2

ROA for the coming year= 11.25%

Explanation:

Weber corporation return on assets for 20X1 can be calculated as follows

ROA= Net income/Average total assets × 100

= 2,450,000/24,500,000 × 100

= 0.1 × 100

= 10%

The profit margin can be calculated as follows

= Net income/sales × 100

= 2,450,000/49,000,000 × 100

= 0.05 × 100

= 5%

The assets turnover ratio can be calculated as follows

= Sales/Average Total assets

= 49,000,000/24,500,000

= 2

The company ROA if when the turnover rate for next year is2.25 and the profit margin remain unchanged can be calculated as follows

= profit margin × assets turnover ratio

= 5% × 2.25

= 11.25%

8 0

2 years ago

EXERCISE 5-11 Missing Data; Basic CVP Concepts LO5-1 LO5-9 Fill in the missing amounts in each of the eight case situations belo

irina1246 [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

A) contribution per unit:

(180,000 - 120,000) / 15,000 = $4

B) net income: 180,000 - 120,000 - 50,000 = 10,000

C) units sold: contribution x units - fixed cost = income

$10 x units sold - 32,000 = 8,000

units sold: 4,000

D) variable cost:

(sales - expense) / units = contribution per unit

(100,000 - expense)/4,000 = 10

expense = 60,000

E) sales:

contribution x units + expense

10,000 x $13 + 70,000 = 200,000

F) fixed expense:

units x contribution - fixed = income

10,000 x $13 - fixed = 12,000

130,000 -12,000 = fixed = 118,000

H) contribution margin unit

contribution x units - fixed cost = income

6,000 x contribution - 100,000 = -10,000

contribution = 90,000 / 6,000 = 15

G) variable expenses:

sales = variable expense + contribution x units sold

300,000 = var expense + 15 x 6000

variable expense = 210,000

5 0

2 years ago