Answer:
$0
Explanation:
There are two Step for the computation of casualty loss deduction if the casualty loss is personal
Step 1 Reduce $100 per casualty event from the casualty loss
Step 2 Reduce 10% of the AGI from the amount you get from step 1
Data
Loss = $2,500
AGI = $35,000
Deduction =?
Solution
Step 1 = $2,500 - $100 = $2,400
Step 2: $2,400 - ($35,000 x 10%) = $0
If the amount in step 2 is $0 then the person is not eligible for casualty loss deduction
Answer:
Maxwell world consider choice equal to $310000
Explanation:
given data
accept a salary = $60,000
salary = $25,000
bonus = 20% of net income
to find out
amount of income would be necessary so that Maxwell would consider
solution
we get here income by bonus that is express as
bonus = 2 ( income - bonus - salary ) ..............1
3500 = 2 ( income - ( 0.2 × 35000 ) - ( 0.2 × (75000 + 35000) )
solve it we get
income = $310000
so Maxwell world consider choice equal to $310000
Answer:
The correct answer is number (1): True.
Explanation:
Due diligence refers to the exercise an individual is subject to after entering a contract with another party by which a certain standard of care is expected from the individual.
The United States Sentencing Commission is the governmental agency in charge of reviewing sentences discrepancies and promoting fair sentencing.
<em>In front of ethical issues within a firm, the U.S. Sentencing Commission states that the company must have disseminated a code of conduct so that the filing company can allege a violation of the due diligence employees are subject to.</em>
Answer:
$124,000
Explanation:
The computation of ending balance in the land account is shown below:-
ending balance in the land account = Beginning balance of Land account + Total balance of land - Cost of land sold
= $90,000 + ($25,000 + $28,000 + $31,000) - $50,000
= $90,000 + $174,000 - $50,000
= $124,000
Therefore for computing the ending balance in the land account we simply applied the above formula.
Explanation:
First of all, the dealer should not have sold the car to the sixteen year old boy without the presence of his parents or any guardian. It is illegal to have a contract with a child who is not legally allowed to drive the car before the age of eighteen.
Now secondly if the dealer has somehow sold the car to the boy, the boy cannot come back after few months and ask for returning his money because he purchased the car, the condition of the condition of the car got worse during the whole time when car was with him, and also there is no legal clause in the agreement which allows him to demand his money back after using the car for this long time. So demanding his money back from the dealer is totally unethical as well as illegal. The dealer is true that the car is still the property of the boy and the money is still the dealer's money.
