Each angle on a triangle would add up to 180 degrees. Since a ladder goes straight up, that angle would be 90 degrees. If you add that with the 39 degree angle, you'd get 129. Subtract that from 180 and you have your answer.
Since the parabola passes by the center its equation is:
y = ax². But it opens downward, that means the coefficient a is negative.
Then the equation becomes:
y = - ax², with x = 0 as its axis of symmetry.
We are given that the height is 84 ft when the opening downward is 42 ft.
That means to the (height) y, corresponds x =+21 & x=-21 (due to symmetry).
In order to calculate a let's plug y & x with their related values:
y = - ax²
84 = - a(21)²
84 = - a(441) and a = - 84/441 ↔ a = - 4/21
And the final equation is : y = -4/21. x²
Answer:
$0.85 per tomato
Step-by-step explanation:
A unit rate is the cost for one item. Like $0.99 for this one bag of skittles.
So $3.40 divided by four is $0.85.
Answer:
B.
Step-by-step explanation:
The double cone is a cone on top of another cone. The bottom cone has the circular base on the bottom and the tip on top. The upper cone is upside down, and the two tips touch. Since the vertical plane goes through the tips of both cones, the cross section must have a shape that gets to a point at the middle of the height.
Answer: B. One triangle with the tip on top and an inverted triangle above it with the tips touching.
Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here 
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that
So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
