Answer:
Partners return on the equity will be 18.8 %
So option (e) will be correct option
Explanation:
We have given Miko's capital account began the year with a balance of $16200
So beginning equity of miko's = $46,200
Ending equity of miko's = $46,200 + $8,700 - $5,200 = $49,700
Average equity
Partners return on equity
So partners return on equity will be 18.8 %
So option (e) will be the correct answer
Answer:
Year Nominal wage Real wage Price level Inflation rate
1 $7 $5 140 Nil
2 $9 $6 150 7.14 %
3 $12 $7.5 160 6.67 %
Explanation:
Note: The table for the question is attached as picture
Price level in Year 1 = (Nominal wage in year 1/Real wage in year 1) * 100
Price level in Year 1 = ($7.00 / $5.00) * 100
Price level in Year 1 = 1.4 * 100
Price level in Year 1 = 140
Real wage in Year 2 = (Nominal wage in year 2 / Price level in year 2) * 100.
Real wage in Year 2 = ($9.00 / 150.00) * 100
Real wage in Year 2 = $6
Nominal wage in Year 3 = (Real wage in Year 3 * Price level in Year 3) / 100.
Nominal wage in Year 3 = ($7.50 * 160) / 100
Nominal wage in Year 3 = $1,200 / 100
Nominal wage in Year 3 = $12
Inflation rate in Year 2 = (Price level in Year 2 - Price level in Year 1) / Price level in Year 1.
Inflation rate in Year 2 = (150 - 140) / 140
Inflation rate in Year 2 = 10 / 140
Inflation rate in Year 2 = 0.0714
Inflation rate in Year 2 = 7.14 %
Inflation rate in Year 3 = (Price level in Year 3 - Price level in Year 2) / Price level in Year 2.
Inflation rate in Year 3 = (160 - 150) / 150
Inflation rate in Year 3 = 10 / 150
Inflation rate in Year 3 = 0.0667
Inflation rate in Year 3 = 6.67%.
Answer:
<u></u>
Explanation:
The <em>expected return</em> is the weighted average of the expected returns in each scenario by its respective probability.
The <em>distribution of the holding period returns </em>(HPR) under three different scenarios is:
State of the economy Scenario #(s) Probability, p(s) HPR
HPR Boom 1 0.336 28.40%
Normal growth 2 0.414 7.90%
Recession 3 0.25 18.90%
The calculations are:
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.