Answer:
The most suitable answer here is D. Concurrent Control.
Explanation:
Concurrent control is also known as preventive controls and steering controls where the aim of the control procedure is to identify the possible flaws of a process and to prevent them before occurring.
Furthermore, in this scenario as you can see, Donald consults production manager and formulates measures as the process is ongoing. This makes it more of a "concurrent control" as well.
So Why did we not use any of the other options?
Option A, reactive controls is incorrect in this case, because reactive measures are completely spontaneous actions that respond to an accident.
Option B is incorrect too, because feedback controls are done after a process has been completed and through identification of falls happened.
Option C, feed forward controls are not correct in this scenario as well. Although it is a type of preventive control, in this scenario it is not entirely preventive. They are formulating measures even as the process is ongoing.
Answer:
rise, fall
Explanation:
In the case when the subsitution effect with respect to the real rate of interest should be saved and more than the income effect on the real rate of interest so if there is an increased in the real rate of interest so there is an increase in the consumption also there is the fall in the savings
Also, if there is a more income effect, the consumption should rise and the savings would decline
Therefore the rise and fall should be considered to fill the blanks
Answer:
9.24 yr
Explanation:
The payback period refers to the amount of time it takes to recover the cost of an investment. In order to find a payback period we need to go through some calculations first
Annual savings = 5 MM Btu/hr x 8,000 hr/yr x $4/MM Btu x 14 MM Btu/hr x 8,000 hr/yr x $7/MMBtu
Annual savings = $0.944 MM/yr
TCI = 
TCI = $4.7 MM
Depreciation - Annualized fixed cost = ![\frac{[4.0 - 0] }{10}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5B4.0%20-%200%5D%20%7D%7B10%7D)
Depreciation - Annualized fixed cost = $0.4 MM/yr
Total cost annualized = Annualized fixed cost + Annual operating cost
Total cost annualized = 0.4 + 0.5
Total cost annualized= 0.9 MM/yr
Annual net (after-tax) profit = Annual income - Total cost annualized x (1-Tax rate + Depreciation
Annual net (after-tax) profit = $0.944 MM/yr - $0.9 MM/yr x 1 -0.25 + $0.4 MM/yr
Annual net (after-tax) profit = 0.433MM/yr
Payback period = 
Payback period = 9.24 yr
The given scenario clearly illustrates Negative leniency
.
Option C
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The performance appraisal is a routine analysis of the results of an individual and of a company's total commitment. A performance appraisal, also defined as an «yearly review», "performance review," or "individual appraisal," assesses the ability, success and progress of an employee or its lack of it.
The manager who is neither tough nor easy with rating employees is committed to negative and positive leniency misconceptions. In the performance evaluation process, the employee's unjustified expectations for increases, promotions or tough jobs can be increased by positive leniency.
The worker may be sick of hitting the head against a wall with excessive slowness or toughness/strictness because the manager can not be pleased despite how hard the person tries.
