Yes in my opinion. People will say no but there is no right answer
Answer:
Generate the fresh set of SSH keys. Offer every member of the team that private key. Customize the public key as a public SSH key for a project in the Cloud Platform project as well as require public SSH keys for each instance
Explanation:
Almost many person seems to have a google profile at their corporation. The vast amount of incidents on Compute Machine have to be handled by the operating staff. Any team member just requires operational accessibility towards the network. The safety department needs to ensure that credentials are distributed in such an administratively efficient way and have to be prepared to recognize that has accessed the specified case.
So, they are creating the latest key set for SSH. Offer every members of the team their private key. Customize its public key as just a public SSH key for such a program in the Cloud Platform project as well as require public SSH keys for each instance.
Answer:
b. Unauthorized access to organization-owned workstations
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, the option the risks would most directly violate HIPAA compliance if compromised is Unauthorized access to organization-owned workstations
Ethical health research and privacy protections both provide valuable benefits to society. Health research is vital to improving human health and health care. Protecting patients involved in research from harm and preserving their rights is essential to ethical research. For the reasons, there certain risk they cannot take, but in this case, the risk they are will to take is the been mentioned.
Answer:
int switch_1,switch_2;
int get_first_switch_state()
{
return switch_1;
}
int get_second_switch_state()
{
return switch_1;
}
int get_lamp_state()
{
if((get_first_switch_state())
if(get_second_switch_state()) return 1;
else
if(!get_second_switch_state()) return 1;
return 0;
}
void toggle_first_switch()
{
if(get_first_switch_state()) switch_1=0;
else switch_1=1;
}
void toggle_second_switch()
{
if(get_second_switch_state()) switch_2=0;
else switch_2=1;
}
Explanation:
Answer:
The proof is in the explanation
Explanation:
is 
if 
for 
.
So, basically, we have to solve the following inequality
Dividing everything by 
to simplify, we have
I am going to use 
. So
There is a solution for the inequality, which proves that 
is
